Absolutely the rest of it, noises, winds, etc. are true, but I'm not sure I completely agree with the "wonderful thing" part of it. Yeah outdoors can be better than an awful room, but not necessarily better than a so-so room; you can be exchanging one set of problems for another, IMHO. It can be like choosing between bird flu and swine flu

.
There's a reason why studio live rooms are designed to control reflections but not eliminate them. You rarely find people recording in totally dead anechoic chambers, and the wide outdoors are basically one big anechoic chamber.
You ever really want to suck the energy out of a kick drum, remove the walls around it completely and give the bass frequencies a chance to stretch out without any reflection whatsoever. It may sound just fine fifty or a hundred of feet away, but at miking distances (or even inside the drum) you'll probably tend to find at least some loss of "oomph". And fro the rest of the kit, you can expect to find a "deadness" to the sound that you just won't find in an enclosed space. This would be especially noticeable on overheads or other stereo pair setups you may normally want to use.
Is all this an idea killer? Not necessarily. Much of it is addressable to some degree in post (processing or recording through a nice a nice reverb chamber or plate along with maybe LF EQ processing on the kick or recording the kick through a quality subwoofer can immensely help, for example.)
And the potential negatives of recording outdoors may not be as bad as the negatives of recording in a really bad room. You certainly get rid of the low ceiling problem and avoid bad bass resonances. But it can come with it's own set of issues, and (IMHO, FWTW

) is not necessarily a quality substitute for a good-sounding room. Unless that's the sound you're going for, of course.
YMMV, etc.
G.