Pico's studio

  • Thread starter Thread starter picostudios
  • Start date Start date
Damn, this is getting ridiculous. I just wanted to show people my setup. Yeah, I know it's not the best studio around, but I'm still damn proud of it. If you don't have anything constructive to say, don't say anything at all.
 
rpc9943 said:
That is so wrong.

RonC


What is wrong is your jumping into this thread, cock in hand, and starting to insult people on a personal level.

Yeah, Pico didn't receive the feedback he was expecting, but while he was a little defensive at first, I certainly had the impression he was interested in learning from others, specifically when we were talking about clipping and mastering.

Am I correct Pico?

But what you've done Ron is ruin a perfectly good thread. Telling me for example that the clipping on Pico's recordings was due to my Genelec's being "crappy" is just hideous. Further insulting those of us who had/have professional recording studios by telling us we're not creative, is also hideous.

All you've done thus far is demonstrate you're nothing more than an uninformed asshole looking for a fight. At Pico's expense no less. This is why a lot of us really can't be bothered anymore.

But what do I know. 37 years old, retired, and recording credits to fill a book.

Ron, fuck you.

Pico, best of luck to you and your recordings. Think compression, it will help you in your mastering.
 
frederic said:
What is wrong is your jumping into this thread with your cock in my hand

Frederic you are so dirty!

Ha, just kiddin.

I am still working with compression. It's a butt to get down right, but I'm gettin there. I just have to learn not to totall squash everything down so much. I have a habbit of doing that to the drums in order to get all the hits the same volume.

I also need to possibly get some of those thick blankets to put on the walls so that they can cancel out the shitty reflections of my dirty house according to MR. Austin, Texas over there. ;-)
 
Excuse me? This is not about flame wars here. I was merely saying that you promote your ego quite obviously.

RonC
 
picostudios said:
I also need to possibly get some of those thick blankets to put on the walls so that they can cancel out the shitty reflections of my dirty house according to MR. Austin, Texas over there. ;-)
Well, I'm glad you have a sense of humor about it.
First impressions are important. You never get a second chance to make one you know. ;)

Like I said before:
Pretend I'm a potential client going to you web-site for the first time, and I see the picture if cables strewn through the hall.
Maybe try swapping that pic out with some shots of your gear? In other words, put your best foot forward.
 
Forget the studio...that's some of the nastiest singing I've ever heard...if you can't understand a word the guy is saying...what's the point?

Guess I'm just old....

Nothing against the recording, but that song is horrible. Doesn't take any talent to scream like that.

Go ahead, fire away........I wouldn't even record that stuff.
 
picostudios said:
I do clean up before bands come in.


Good. What I am saying, and what I think Michael is saying, is that if you are going to make it look better than that for your clients, then you should clean it up for the photos. It is not about having the greatest studio in the world. I have worked in some of the greatest studios in the world, and they are usually sterile and uncomfortable places to make music. I stopped working in places like that because I was sick of working on uninspired music where the only concern was not offending anyone (corporate work sucks). That is what gets done in most of the best studios in the world, and I for one want no part of it. The trick is to make what you do have as appealing as possible to as many people as possible, which means having your pictures be of the place when it is clean.

And by the way Ron, I was never hired for my gear. I didn't have any that I brought with me. I was ALWAYS hired for my ears, and that was all I would bring with me, period.


Light

"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi
 
OK, I give up, how do I get to the page? Parent directory just takes me to the Yahoo advertizing page.

rpe



Index of /picosstudio
Name Last modified Size Description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parent Directory 22-Apr-2004 23:21 -


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
79_Les_Paul said:
Forget the studio...that's some of the nastiest singing I've ever heard...if you can't understand a word the guy is saying...what's the point?

Guess I'm just old....

Nothing against the recording, but that song is horrible. Doesn't take any talent to scream like that.

Go ahead, fire away........I wouldn't even record that stuff.
I wasn't EVEN going to comment on the ... ummm... music... I guess you call it.
Most people here know how I feel about screaming into a mike.
"... I can't sing, so I'll just scream. We don't have to be good, we just have to be loud!..." That's not what I call artistry. But I'm an old fart too, and I like my music with an actual melody.

Anyway, I wont record that stuff either. What's the point????

postscript: The song IS clipping.... horribly.
 
I would just like to point out that just because a vocalist is screaming rather than singing.. it does not mean that he can't sing...

The vocalist for two of my bands.. he screams in one, sings in the other. He is a very well respected choral singer at my high school.

Different strokes for different folks... I suppose.
 
Do you really think showing your dislike of Netscape is relevant to potential customers? :rolleyes:


What's with the blurry picture of the guy with the mic? And the blurry back of the head? And the blurry mic on a stand? Why even bother with pictures if half of them you can't see?

And what's up with the 2 old ladies and the little baby on the front page? They seem to be the most unlikely people that would be recording at your studio. I'm not sure what kind of message you are trying to convey here.

If I was a potential customer and seen your website, I would go elsewhere.
 
Well, apparently the bands that have replied to me seem not to mind. I posted on a few music message boards and now Im pretty much booked till August.
 
Pico studios- don't worry. So you lose a few customers? ;) Your website caters to a certain type of band... It's not meant to look like a refined "pro studio". It's meant for people who make different types of music. They understand. The guys here might not.

RonC
 
rpc9943 said:
Pico studios- don't worry. So you lose a few customers? ;) Your website caters to a certain type of band... It's not meant to look like a refined "pro studio". It's meant for people who make different types of music. They understand. The guys here might not.

RonC
Afraid I have to disagree...growing a business has so much to do with perception. If people decide you don't take much pride in your website, they'll also percieve you don't take much pride in your recordings....

I'm not trying to slam Picostudio...I know as I gain more clients I'll probably be faced with recording music I don't personally care for..maybe I will politely decline some though..

Crisp and clean images of a clean organized studio just portrays the image that you got your act together, in all areas.
 
Not a slam, but I think the real reason you are booked until August is the $10/hr pricing. That's cheap.

I don't think your website helps you much, but at that price I don't think bands are looking for a pro studio. I do think that you would put forth a more professional image with some better pictures. I actually liked the old ladies picture. But, the blurry pictures of your studio are annoying. You might actually try getting clear pictures of your gear and space.
 
If I have cash left over from tomorrows paycheck. I am goin to buy a new digital camera. Now that I have the password and such for the website, I will be managing it on my own. Clear photos here we come!
 
Clipping and Compression

Pico,

I thought maybe you might be interested in seeing what I heared when I listened to your first clip. I'm not attacking your work or your recording, but instead trying to help, so please take it as such.

Look very carefully at this picture:

sonar.gif


The top pair of sinewaves (white background) is your first mp3, imported "as is". Right at the left edge of the audio window your track swoops down from about zero, almost to the bottom of the window's edge but not quite (no clip), then swoops up across zero, and hits the top of the window (clipping), goes horizontal a short distance, then swoops down, and repeats, with a smaller little bang off the upper window again towards the right (clipping).

Looking at your mp3 recording end to end, I observed several things. First, the left channel (upper half of the white audio area) clips more often than the right channel (bottom half of the white audio area). I also noticed both channels only clip on the positive side of the waveform, not the negative, and this is true for both left and right channels.

Now lets look at your recording again, but instead of looking at the squared parts, look at the overall waveform. You can clearly see a larger sine-wave shaped thing, with smaller waveforms all across it. Look at the smaller waveforms, you'll notice they have a certain amount of "swing" to them. The distance top to bottom of the smaller waveforms, is the amount of headroom you're using at that instant in the recording.

If you look at the bottom track (black background), thats my recording you listened to the other day. Same type of thing, larger waveforms with smaller waveforms all over it. But what you might notice is that the smaller waveforms spread all over, are much smaller in the vertical than yours. *This* is what compression looks like.

Hope that helps...
 
Back
Top