As far as "emission" goes - that is another story.
Basically - bad emission - bad tube, good emission - good tube. Right? Well, maybe so, but I am not sure about it.
In general, the problem is that if you see a nicely glowing tube it does not mean that it is a good tube. Also a tube that is tested "BAD" for emission is not necessarily is useless or flat out bad. I have for example a tube that I've tested "BAD" for emission. A nice looking british 7025 tube. So, I've said: "Sh*t! Arghhh - to damn bad." SAnd then I've tried it in one of my guitar amps in preamp section, and it actually worked just fine. Maybe not so good for a lab test or for some application, but I could rockin'roll with it pretty damn well.
I've read that "good emission" does not mean that the tube is good, but I have never had such experience, or maybe it's because I just do not have high demands on a tube performance.
Also, I think it would be worthy to mention here. I think, when dealing with any old tube piece of gear - the tubes most likely are fine in there and if it does not work right, then the problems are most likely somewhere else. I maybe wrong on that one, though, but I have been successful in the past in scoring great tubes by purchasing old non-working DOA gear for cheap

- that is the trick, well, sort of .
here's that tube, tested BAD, but it rocks - so go figure.