normalize

  • Thread starter Thread starter paresh
  • Start date Start date
P

paresh

Member
Hi guys - When do you normalize (GT Pro) - once only, often, before submixing...? Thanks.
 
When you say normalise are you referring to the final mix...

All that normalising does is basically raises the volume of the track by the difference between the loudest peak and what every you normalise to.

You can normalise or use a compressor to get a similar (not the same) result, ie a 'louder' track with peaks 'squished'.

Porter
 
Hmmm... the actual challenge is to *record* it as loud as possible, without noises interference nor distorted (clipping). As we getting better and better using compressor, there won't be no need for normalizing so often anymore :) But if there is a case when we need to normalize a track, I'll do it *only* once to certain track/s before mixing, OR once on mixing result :)
But after I got Waves Ultramaximizer, I was glad to erase the word "normalizing" on my mixing dictionary :D

;)
Jaymz
 
I'm not a fan of "normalising"

I'm not familiar with GT pro,but are'nt there other options such as envelopes,compression or automation?
 
Never.
Never done it, don't even know where the button is in ACKUS.
I like the one that says 'Meters Peak+RMS', and 'Peak Hold'.
...And the volume slider of course.:D
Wayne
 
James Argo said:
Hmmm... the actual challenge is to *record* it as loud as possible, without noises interference nor distorted (clipping). As we getting better and better using compressor, there won't be no need for normalizing so often anymore :) But if there is a case when we need to normalize a track, I'll do it *only* once to certain track/s before mixing, OR once on mixing result :)
But after I got Waves Ultramaximizer, I was glad to erase the word "normalizing" on my mixing dictionary :D

;)
Jaymz
Click to expand...

:p
Ok, just for fun! A) You don't need to record as loud as possible. (Or maybe Why would want to do that...) And B) Why would you normalize a track?
Oops. When you say track, did you mean a mix?
Wayne
 
Normalizing serves no useful function that I've ever found - in ANY stage of the process.
 
I agree with Dachay!

Normalizing should be forbidden by law... :mad:
 
Re: I agree with Dachay!

moskus said:
Normalizing should be forbidden by law... :mad:
Click to expand...

Agreed!

Why do they put it there in the first place...?? is there a particulalr scenerio that it can actually be helpful??
 
Re: Re: I agree with Dachay!

Leeking said:
Why do they put it there in the first place...?? is there a particulalr scenerio that it can actually be helpful??
Click to expand...
Well, it does make it easier for the "less experienced" to "make everything as loud as a comercial CD"... :rolleyes:
 
Paresh, whilst my fellow members knock chunks out of each other and settle old scores, Normalizing is a desructive effect that cannot be reversed without degrading the original signal. Thats why everyone here has a "downer" on on it.

It about as useful as......well........Console View:p
 
mixsit said:
:p
Ok, just for fun! A) You don't need to record as loud as possible. (Or maybe Why would want to do that...) And B) Why would you normalize a track?
Oops. When you say track, did you mean a mix?
Wayne
Click to expand...

Heh heh heh.. :D
A) I mean higher Noise To Signal Ratio... :D Loudest against noise floor without getting clipping/distorted :)

B) ...hhhmmmm... yeah, why would I :( :confused: Well, actualy, on very rare case, I took my best shoot recorded too weak compared to other tracks :o It's great, close to perfect... just somehow a bit too far from the mic, so few dB quiter than the rest. I could just raise the track's volume, but sometime I *did* the normalize on that track to match other's average level... It's my subjective way of work anyway. I only did it on certain case / track which I know will be okay to do so... in other word...

BOYS AND GIRLS... PLEASE, DON'T TRY TO DO THIS AT HOME...

IT'S VERY.... DANGERRRRROOOUUSS... :D :D :D
 
Hey! Paul and Dachay! Here! NOW!!!! :mad: :mad: :mad:


Yee of little faith... You know that only the pro's use the Console View. :p
 
mixsit said:
Never.
Never done it, don't even know where the button is in ACKUS.
I like the one that says 'Meters Peak+RMS', and 'Peak Hold'.
...And the volume slider of course.:D
Wayne
Click to expand...

beautiful explanation. i use TRIM as well as the volume slider and peak+rms meters.

typically, i like to record so that my peaks are hitting pretty good at about -6db. i use to be scared to record that hot (24bit) because of the fear of digital clipping, but i've gotten braver. if i have a track that's peaking pretty good at -9db, i'll bring the TRIM up to +3db so that the peaks are now at -6db.

then i start mixing.

once i get the volumes where i want them (depth), then i start looking to see what i need to compress or eq (height).

once i get the compression and eq where i think i want it, then i start panning (width).

once i get the instrumentation and vocals placed mixed in a stereo field, then i start applying any fx to get more detailed depth perception.
 
But after I got Waves Ultramaximizer, I was glad to erase the word "normalizing" on my mixing dictionary
Click to expand...

Hey James,
Which Waves Ultramaximizer do you have, L1 or L2? I have the L1 and I am pretty happy with it but I noticed they've recently released the L2 and clam it's God's answer to all mastering and compression issues. Have you had a chance to use it, and is it worth the cheddar they're asking for it????
 
acidrock said:
Hey Moskus

<<<<<<<look!
Click to expand...

LOL!!!!! :D :D :D

Dammit, Acid. I almost spewed coffee on my "new" laptop! :mad: :D :mad: :D


You know you can't make it stick, right? The Console View is for winners. Period. Are you a winner? Eh? :rolleyes:
 
kgbjamin said:
Hey James,
Which Waves Ultramaximizer do you have, L1 or L2? I have the L1 and I am pretty happy with it but I noticed they've recently released the L2 and clam it's God's answer to all mastering and compression issues. Have you had a chance to use it, and is it worth the cheddar they're asking for it????
Click to expand...
L2 is a little less harsh than the L1 IMHO.

Overall I think the L2 is a notch better, but I don't know if I'd go out and buy it if I already had the L1.
 
Hey dachay2tnr

Thanks 4 your reply. I'll take it into consideration
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top