H
Harvey Gerst
New member
Well, this is part of a first listen I did to the Marshall mics over 3 years ago (1/12/2001):bgavin said:I read http://prorec.com/prorec/articles.nsf/articles/7E01340C209C8C99862568AD0072955BBruce Richardson's scathing review of the MXL 2001P, and this put a good scare into me over Marshall mics.
Yes, I know Harvey likes Marshalls, and that counts for a whole lot with me.
The results:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The mics I didn't like:
Marshall MXL-2001 $199??
Harsh top end, thin bottom, compared to the TLM-103. It was a little warmer than the Nady SCM-1000, but the Nady had a smoother top end. The 2001 is everything that I don't like about all the really inexpensive large diaphragm condensor mics that I've listened to over the years, including the AKG C3000, the Oktava 219, and some of the early AT low cost units.
Marshall MXL-600 $270
Veiled top end and exaggerated low-mid, compared to the Oktava MC-012. About 1 dB lower output than the Oktava. It just sounded very dull and lifeless. Very easy to bottom out as well.
Most of the other mics they made were pretty decent sounding (the V67 and MXL603's in particular) and the full listening tests go into some more detail, but I don't think I sugar-coated my findings about any of these mics.