N-Track strengths/weaknesses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter notCardio
  • Start date Start date
N

notCardio

I walk the line
For any of you with any experience with both N-Track and any other software, what would you say it's relative strengths an weaknesses are? What does it do better than other programs, if anything? What does it suck at, or is unable to do completely? How wold you rate it's learning curve and ease of use? Is it more or less taxing on the PC than others? What is it that you like about it, other than the fact that it's cheap?

Thanks in advance.
 
Ntrack is very easy to use and has very little drain on PC resourses , IMHO comparitivly speaking as compared to others like Cakewalk which I also have but rarely use because its not compatible with my sound card, etc....
For me, I can get down to the business of making music without a lot of hassel. Im not much into MIDI , so I cant speak for how good it is on that subject. Im mainly a guitarist so My stuff is guitar orientated rock. Ntrack works great for that.
Myx
 
N-Track is a wonderful program!

I know everyone always mentions the price, but that's because we're so surprised at how much the program includes for $42 ($64 is you want 24-bit recording).

Besides flexible multi-band EQ's for each channel, support for both DirectX and VST plugins and up to 32 AUX channels, N-Track features automated slider movements, ASIO support and a built-in MP3 encoder (I don't know which algorithm it uses).

I am quite new to the recording bizz (check out one of my tracks at
), but I can't see moving to another program anytime soon.
 
Back
Top