Just goes to show: one ought not rile a synaesthetic Pierrot with indignant & inaccurate rants about one's own perceptions of hostility when the hostility emanates from one'self and is projected, somewhat erroneously, upon those offering guidance in what is obviously a oxygen rarified atmosphere for one.
Perhaps a brief stint in the soliloquy tank with a bottle of the hotelier's best in addition to the help & support of one's own track will save us all from the desperately unwanted distraction of lending an ear to the aural expression of others whilst in the process minting a Reason d'turd.
But no, turn the other cheek: pick an offering to the clique/in crowd/elite/faction for which you desire a serious critique on & present it for scrutiny. People may be able to sacrifice that which you are willing to forgo in a humble & ultimately futile attempt to enable the unassistable.
Nb - there is one failsafe to ensure maxiumum recognition and attract overwhelming gratuitous fawning: supply a "click" track.
One final thought: the use of YOU when one obviously means "me, I, one, the speaker/writer/author in the 1st, 2nd & 3rd person" is a projection of one's own feelings, emotions, concerns, understandings and frustrations and yet is often a reflection/utterance of the views made informally on behalf of a given community, collective, group or family. In this instance the attempt to commune, when accompanied as it is with your backhander is, definitely, unwelcome.
