
famous beagle
Well-known member
Tom Serb's "Music Theory for Guitarists" is one of the very best entry level theory books out there. It'll help make sense of the questions you have.
I think you mean Tom Kolb

Tom Serb's "Music Theory for Guitarists" is one of the very best entry level theory books out there. It'll help make sense of the questions you have.
I wouldn't confuse with the issue of temperament for now, we all know where that will lead..
thebigcheese, As promised a simple diagram of the string divisions and their ratios. From it you can see how the ratios are arrived at and how they directly relate to what is going on with a vibrating string. All these vibrations are present in any vibrating string and regardless of it's length they occur at the same relative positions. Those between the 1:1 (fundemental) and 2:1 (octave) are the partials and 3:2 (the fifth) is harmonically the most well matched to the other equivalent vibrations in the root string or note.
Again this doesn't help you understand keys but it explains why the fifth is so important.
I understand the basics of how the circle works (you go up 5 or down 5, depending on the direction and that gets you the scale with one more accidental in it, or one less, depending on where you are), it's just that it doesn't really help me hear what key a song is in. It helps me understand how the scales are related to one another, I guess, but I don't really see any particular significance to that yet. Except for when my professor asks what key a song is in on my final. Then I can just count up or down from C and figure it out.The circle of fifths is the answer. So kudos who posted the chart. The rest of you have to stay after class and peel gum off of the bottom of the desks.
I understand the basics of how the circle works (you go up 5 or down 5, depending on the direction and that gets you the scale with one more accidental in it, or one less, depending on where you are)...
Thank you. I wasn't sure about that when I wrote it and figured I probably wasn't saying it right. It just seemed like there ought to be an easier way to say "sharp or flat". Now that I think about it, that's about the same number of letters anyway... You win.Not to pick nits, but the sharps or flats in a particular key are not accidentals; accidentals are notes in a score that are marked sharp, flat, or natural because they don't conform to the key signature, i.e., a flat 7 in a major key.
For those of you who have read Fretboard Logic, I have a question. He says that there are five fundamentally different chord forms possible as a result of the guitar's tuning: C, A, G, E, and D. What about B and F forms? Or am I just getting hung up on the naming here? It sounds like what he might be saying is that there are five forms (which have nothing to do with the ABCDEFG note sequence) and he just names them in accordance with what chord they happen to make at the open position. Is that correct?
I mean, I get that they are movable forms and all, I'm just wondering why there isn't a B form or an F form. Is it because there aren't open positions for either of those? I guess I understand that there are 5 forms (shapes), I'm just not sure why there aren't 7 if all the forms are based on one of the 7 notes/chords.
Check this page out, i found it somewhere a long time ago and found it to have a pretty good coverage of theory.
http://chordmaps.com/index.htm
Daav