B
Beltrom
New member
Yes, but we're cute monkeys!
I think this has turned into a camouflaged postpadding thread.
I think this has turned into a camouflaged postpadding thread.
MaxB said:Yes, confirm. No one can hear the difference. Sorry all you golden-ear wannabe... No one can hear the difference. I could write it on the marble. The difference it's so subtle that if you can hear the difference we are into Sci-Fi.
drstawl said:Non un problema.
A clip containing an example of each.
Even at 160 Kbps the difference is obvious.
It's more than just panning and no reverb (other than that built into the synth patches) was used.canada-paul said:The 2nd sample (I presume the GINA) towards the end of the mp3 seems to have a wider stereo field, and maybe a little more space, or reverb.
But your sample has nothing to do with 1/8" vs 1/4" or XLR plugs does it?
webstop said:I moved from SB to 2496 to 1010, and I could hear the difference every time. I feel so special now! Nobody can hear the difference, but I can!
And I don't need any tests to convince me because I absolutely trust my own hearing.
And two short advises to MaxB.
1. Don't think that all who dissagree with you are deaf idiots.
2. Don't think that YOUR way of using a home studio is the ONLY way.
James Argo said:MaxB, do you run SBLive! on Win2K or WinXP?
Have you checked this driver out...
http://www.emu.com/support/aps.asp
It's designed for APS, but will work for any EMU10K based card (including SBLive!). Tell the story if you have...
Jaymz
adent said:what you use to record your music adds about the last 2-3% of gloss! the other 97% is your composition, arrangement, and performance!
MaxB said:Polaris. I'm starting to think you can't understand nothing but the User Manual. The fact you talked about Audigy2 is the proof (In case you don't know I'm talking about SBLive with EMU10k1 chip. Not EMU10k2. About Audigy2: it's a fake! Audigy2 can't really record at 24/96).
theshaggyfreak:
The noise gate shouldn't even be in the equation of if it's a good sound card for what you're doing. You can put a noise gate on any sound card and get that result.
You are wrong. You missed something. The noise gate is not between the source and the physical line in. The noise gate is after the AC97 Line in (software). So what the noise gate is working mainly it's not the external source. The primary scope of the noise gate is to reduce the noise of the AC97 codec (normally at -76dB). I hope you can understand the evident difference.
MaxB
adent said:
buy the homerecording CD and have a listen... what you use to record your music adds about the last 2-3% of gloss! the other 97% is your composition, arrangement, and performance!
there are lots of constructive threads on these boards... maybe everyone should stop devoting time and energy to this stupid one!
rock on
george
Polaris. I'm starting to think you can't understand nothing but the User Manual. The fact you talked about Audigy2 is the proof (In case you don't know I'm talking about SBLive with EMU10k1 chip. Not EMU10k2. About Audigy2: it's a fake! Audigy2 can't really record at 24/96).
Chris Tondreau said:Aw....geez.... I'm going to spend the afternoon finding everyone I don't agree with and put *them* on *my* ignore list. I'll have the longest ignore list on the *whole* BBS. Every time in the future I don't agree with someone.... BOOM!!..... ignore list for you, buddy!!![]()
From now on, I'll be guaranteed of logging onto my own little E-topia daily to talk to people who think like ME, act like ME, like the products *I* like, work like ME, and heck... maybe even look like ME. Yes, folks, avoid conflict at all costs.
Voxvendor... you're first, ya homo!
Sonicpaint.... you're next!
MisterQcue, dtb, LiSlim, participant, Rats, JGourd, FM, Roel, Daf, Beezelbubba, Upstate, and all the other JamFest folks..... *IGNORED....all o' ya!!*..... I want to be lonely and uninformed, dammit!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
Chris