R
Rev E
New member
Originally posted by Rev E Yeah, but how does it "sound?"
Rather than quote the obvious (Harvey's comments), I'll just go back to what I said earlier. I suppose it's somewhat valuable to see what a manufacturer about the frequency curves of its mics. But, I generally don't find "much" value in any frequency curves by the manufacturer. Many of the mics du jour say their mics are relatively flat. It means little. What the mic sounds like is a matter of hearing and cannot be translated in any meaningful way via a chart (not that there's anything wrong with that)

DJL and I were yammerin' about nothin' particularly important. He says it's not scooped. I say it is. Given that everything is a matter of hearing and given that hearing is a subjective thing, noone's right. There's no right answer, because it depends on what things sound like AND what how each of us defines certain words (i.e. what does "warm" sound like?") AND the sources we use the tools on AND...
So in the final analysis, the choice of the V67 and C1 is a personal decision. I find both useful for different things and I think it's in the budget engineer's better interest to have both if possible. If you can only have one, then you owe it to yourself to listen to the mics yourself, preferably in your studio, with your other gear, and on the source that you intend to use the mic on before making that choice.