
I am clueless. ?????
If your doing music tech or music instrument tech it will almost certainly be a core module or requirement. It's the foundation for so much of the wider subject.
I gotta stand up for ol' Robert Johnson. I can't believe anyone would dis him. When I first heard him, I simply couldn't believe anyone could convey so much emotion with either their voice or their guitar.
He's definitely down in my book as the best blues guitarist, blues singer, and (assuming he did write them all) blues songwriter in history. Oh man ... when he says "can't you hear the wind howl?" in "Come on in My Kitchen" .... I can't remember the time something gave me chills like that the first time I heard it!
I enjoy his voice, and love Come on in my kitchen, I just don't understand why his guitar playing is always praised before anything, just didn't get into it too much.
Context. Where does his mystique come from? Mostly from the British blues guys of the `60's - i.e., mostly Clapton. Now, when those guys where growing up, all they had to listen to was skiffle and whatever else England was putting out in the 1950's - and it WASN'T Chuck Berry or Buddy Holly. So, when they managed to find some old blues records from the US, it was unlike anything they had ever heard before. That kind of thing leaves an impression.
Add the very normal and natural tendency of people to think that the only good music is the stuff they heard when they were between the ages of 14 and 25, and you've got some of the most well known guitarists on the planet talking in ever interview they have ever given about this guy. Because of the context in THEIR lives, he really was that big of a deal for them. You've heard his stuff, at least to some extent, filtered through just about everything you've ever heard. You're context is different.
Light
"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi
With Robert Johnson, I don't even think about things like "Well ... his techinque may have been good for back then, but ..." Things like technique don't even come to mind. I just hear him as the total picture; kind of like ... he is the blues to me. His voice, his guitar work ... It doesn't matter if he doesn't have more chops than so and so. Just about everything he played and sang sounds like gold to me.
I'd like to diss a very UNfamous guitar player,you know him as "Purge",a dying goat has better tone than that tin ear asshat!![]()
Obscurity is too good for you!You just keep talking there, buddy...the more you blab away, the less likely you are to notice that anvil that I've precariously perched at the top of that cliff just waiting to fall on your horrible head!!
(oh shit, I just gave away my plan...hell, time to call Acme again...)
No. He is a "delayist".![]()
Context. Where does his mystique come from? Mostly from the British blues guys of the `60's - i.e., mostly Clapton. Now, when those guys where growing up, all they had to listen to was skiffle and whatever else England was putting out in the 1950's - and it WASN'T Chuck Berry or Buddy Holly. So, when they managed to find some old blues records from the US, it was unlike anything they had ever heard before. That kind of thing leaves an impression.
Add the very normal and natural tendency of people to think that the only good music is the stuff they heard when they were between the ages of 14 and 25, and you've got some of the most well known guitarists on the planet talking in ever interview they have ever given about this guy. Because of the context in THEIR lives, he really was that big of a deal for them. You've heard his stuff, at least to some extent, filtered through just about everything you've ever heard. You're context is different.
Light
"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi