I know the OP is pretty set on the CAD mic package, but I'm going to toss in my experience here in saying that less is definitely more. I had a Nady mic package, which is probably fairly similar to the CAD package, and found that the kick mic was easily the worst part of the kit. I always had to crank the low end on it to get a usable sound. The overheads were alright, but they also required a fair amount of EQing to get anything decent out of them. On my band's web site (I think there's a link in my signature), we have a song called "Shells" that I recorded with the Nady package. I recorded it with the whole kit--overheads, kick, snare, and tom mics--but wound up deleting all the tom tracks (maybe even the snare track) and EQing the overheads. These days, I generally get most of my snare sound from the overheads with a little bit of a close mic mixed in for some added smackiness. I still mic the kick, though, using an Audix D6. I wouldn't use that mic for jazz or something where you want the kick to sound like an actual drum, but when you're doing rock and you just want it to thump with a little click in there, it's perfect. As others have said, the drummer is probably more important than the mics.
On the other hand, if you're not the drummer and you're planning on having lots of bands come in and record with their drummers, then you probably would be better off with mics on everything because the drummers very well might suck. If you are the drummer, though, and you're only recording yourself, I'd just stick with practicing and listening back to your recordings to see what you need to do better.
And don't listen to people at Guitar Center when they tell you you need all kinds of mics. I started working there and tried to tell someone he only needed 4 mics for drums and everyone got on my case about it because they're all a bunch of idiots. So now I will probably tell people they need 8 mics unless no one else is around.