Don't Believe The Hype

  • Thread starter Thread starter PANTYBOY
  • Start date Start date

DO THE FANS CARE WHAT GEAR YOU USE

  • As long as the song's hot, "Who cares?"

    Votes: 6 17.1%
  • Most fans still wouldn't know what gear it was if you told them.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Most fans check to see what gear the song was recorded with before they buy the album.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Most fans don't even know what that gear does. It's all about the finished product.

    Votes: 10 28.6%
  • I won't listen to anyones vocals unless its been recorded with a Nuemann.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • PANTYBOY sucks!

    Votes: 19 54.3%

  • Total voters
    35
  • Poll closed .
You know what they say, when everybody seems to have a problem, maybe the problem is you.

I'm a newbie, and the people here have been very welcoming to me, and with my whopping 600 bucks worth of gear they have been more then happy to help me with all my questions, and I've become a better home recorder then I was before.

Now that I know what my components are doing, I can wisely upgrade as I can afford it, and everyone here is still happy to give me thier opinion, moving from a Beheringer to a Mackie, no one is telling me its Amek or nothing.

Anyways, I'm just glad you typed your last post like someone that understands English, it was giving me a headache.
 
[Temporary Mode]acting my age[/Temporary Mode]


I think Pantyboy can use a new set of panties, but I didn't say that. :D


If he ever finds his girlfriend listening to laffy taffy, then I can only *imagine* the shit she'll be getting herself into. (Maybe she'll get an email with a 500 page essay on marketing scams and why everything she knows is wrong?)


I don't know what's worse, listening to laffy taffy, or having a self proclaimed genious tell me that I suck for listening to laffy taffy.
 
A few things. I think this post was directly targeted at me. I live in suburbia, right on a golf course. I have money, well I don't but my peoples do. I get loans, and lots of them because I only work in the summer, so I pay it back then. Anyway, FL, I'll take your side with that, it's def. underrated, and I find that I'm a great FL user. I can make anything from classical music to dance, the program just works great...except for some of the clicks when you play a piece back in FL. Now with the equipment...I used a 10 track Behringer mixer and some cheap audio technica mics, I pluged the stereo out into my line in and recorded, ok quality but not great, then I got the lexicon and sometimes put my mixer into that, the quality is VERY noticable! I don't understand why people have some equipment, but to each his own. I'd say ignore what some people say on here or anywhere, try the stuff out that interests you and if you like it use it, if you don't don't. If you have some personal vendetta against what a few people told you, then just don't listen. I think we are all adults here and can just say "Well, you might know what you're talking about, but we could possibly have differences of oppinions as far as "what sounds good?"

I'm done, I just feel better now.

Have a great day people.
 
So to summerize this thread i`d say .....

Pantyboy has the worlds first computer keyboard with both velocity and after touch , unfortunately it results in caps and italics when he gets angry :D

BTW my gear is crap and I have no talent but i still make music living in Suburban Canada :o
 
LeeRosario said:
ultimately it's your ears that decide, man. I don't see why people are so afraid to trust thier ears combined with a little kindergarden know-how on electronics.

Agreed,but if mans ears never heard a good sounding preamp,man is blind to the fact that there is something more that needs to be done to the sound.

I thought my mixes were ok,but when i got the preamp,i started thinking that my mixer are ok :D get it?
 
I have owned every peice of junk recording mic, preamp (insert any gear under $500 here) and created some real peices of art. I have also spent a ton on high end gear in recent years. I have to say I enjoy making music on the high end gear much more than the low end gear. The reason is that is it is more efficient and quality results come quicker.

I don't hold the gear responsible for the ultimate outcome however, it's a means to an end. I do like making efficient use of my time though.

My best work is always more centered around proper arranging and clean performances. Great results are primarily the work that goes into the creating and performance and lesser the gear.
 
PANTYBOY said:
i'm not the one calling people assholes, morons and whatnots.
....But you did insinuate that anyone with a differing opinion compared to yours is an "asshole, moron, or whatnot".

Shame on you for being so unwilling to read or acccept different viewpoints ( based on experience) that may differ from your views or experience.

Shame on you, Pantywaste! :rolleyes:
 
cortexx said:
BTW my gear is crap and I have no talent but i still make music living in Suburban Canada

I can relate, man. And you know what? I'm still really enjoying the ride. And some good folks here have thrown me a lifeline more than once along the way.

And, Gecko, kudos for your excellent summary of some thoughts buried in the slings here.

Yeah, definitely an interesting thread in some weird way, which means a nod to PB for kicking it off in his own style.

J.
 
jeffree said:
Yeah, definitely an interesting thread in some weird way, which means a nod to PB for kicking it off in his own style.

J.
Huh? Do you equate having style and being obnoxious as being one and the same, Jeffree? Rhetorical question, dude. :rolleyes:
 
Middleman said:
I have owned every peice of junk recording mic, preamp (insert any gear under $500 here) and created some real peices of art. I have also spent a ton on high end gear in recent years. I have to say I enjoy making music on the high end gear much more than the low end gear. The reason is that is it is more efficient and quality results come quicker.

I don't hold the gear responsible for the ultimate outcome however, it's a means to an end. I do like making efficient use of my time though.

My best work is always more centered around proper arranging and clean performances. Great results are primarily the work that goes into the creating and performance and lesser the gear.

Amen! I can't agree with this more!

Yes, high end gear usually equals great results much quicker. BUT, not having it isn't an excuse for not having good recordings either!

With a good song and a good performer, junky gear all of a sudden becomes far less of an issue in the outcome!
 
I'm guessing Pantyboy listens to rap... where quality doesn't really matter in the music itself.
 
noodles2k5 said:
I'm guessing Pantyboy listens to rap... where quality doesn't really matter in the music itself.

Listens to pap? huh? wha? ;)
 
gecko zzed said:
There are some key thoughts I found winding through this thread.

They are:

1 High end equipment doesn't guarantee high end results. Talent and skill are required.

2 Low end equipment doesn't guarantee low end results. A skilled guitarist friend was able to wring the most amazing sounds out of a crappy, untuneable guitar I had laying around. Gifted people are able to work around the limitations of their equipment.

3 In the end, it is the results that count, not the process nor the tools used to get those results. Let the ear be the judge.

4 The choice of tools is dependent on budget available, level of sophistication of the user and desired quality. It is not easy to juggle these three, and we need to know their relative importance before recommending something or criticising a choice.

5 Generalised statements (favourable or otherwise) of particular products are an expression of personal preference and opinion, and carry no more weight than that. All products have their virtues and vices. Whether these matter or not needs to be considered in the context of intended use and other factors affecting choice.

6 Finally (and possibly repetitively), musicality is a function of the brain, not of the equipment.

THATS ALL I WAS SAYING...MAN...ALL I WAS SAYING
ATLEAST SOMEBODY GOT THE POINT!

It seems some of the offended posters know these things are true and are mad at themselves for spending thousands of $$$ on useless gear and have
yet deciphered a technique to record a fairly decent mix whereas I get heavy
rotation with my fl homestudio tracks on our local clearchannel station
with no payola. ps (and i got groupy hoes & hood fame) :D

(And I was referring to recording rap, where gear quality isn't usually a factor
thats why i used the laffy taffy reference to show that garbage track & garbage song could still get you #1 spot on the charts)
 
And another fact,.....not speculation as some of these posters are posting their personaal preference

"laffy taffy" a song made with standard FL Studio presets and a microphone has
made recordbreaking billboard history & ringtone history (Yes,its true, go check)

So doesn't that mean in a sense "FL Studio" made history?
Atleast to some extent?
And doesn't that back up my statement with hard evidence?
Stop being biased and be honest for a second.
 
Last edited:
the only tool you need in this business is good ears. If you can't tell the difference in sound quality from a soundblaster to an apogee, a behringer monitor to an Adams, a radioshack mic to a neuman....THEN you're in the wrong hobby/pastime/proffesion

Have I used a Behringer mixer?

yes

Have I used an SSL?

yes

could I HEAR a difference?

yes

get it?
 
8tothebar said:
Do you equate having style and being obnoxious as being one and the same, Jeffree?

From Webster's: style--"manner of expressing thought..." Note that there's nothing inherently positive or negative there. You can read "own style" any way you want.

J.
 
FOR ALL THOSE WHO DISAGREE
CHECK THIS CLASSIC THREAD
https://homerecording.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=48420&highlight=legacy

IT SHOWS NUMEROUS CLASSIC ALBUMS RECORDED WITH JUST RADIOSHACK
$10 MICROPHONES AND 4 TRACK FOSTEX & TASCAM TAPE DECKS THAT
SOUND BETTER THAN YOUR WHOLE DIGITAL/ANALOG SETUP HANDS DOWN!

FACE IT.

THE GEAR DOESN'T MATTER
AT ALL!

ATLEAST TO A REAL MUSICIAN
(MUSICIANS DON'T NEED COMPUTERS) ;) ALL THEY NEED IS A MIC AND AN
INSTRUMENT AND THEIR VOICE

FAKE ASS WANNABES NEED THE LATEST COMPRESSOR/REVERB/HARMONIC EXCITER AND WHAT NOT TO POLISH THOSE TURDS OFF :D
 
noodles2k5 said:
I'm guessing Pantyboy listens to rap... where quality doesn't really matter in the music itself.


I dare you to say that to someone like Dr Dre, Eminem, Snoopdog Ect. do you think that they dont care about the quality of their music? Shit, Dre problably has made more money (tripple fold) than two or three of your favorite rock bands COMBINED! :rolleyes:
 
HA!
I See Why These Guys Don't Get It.
They Are Home Recordist
They're Music Gets No Play Outside Of Their Homes :rolleyes:

QUESTION:
IF I SANG A VERSE INTO A MIC WITH BACKGROUNG MUSIC PLAYING
IS THAT A SONG

IF THAT SAME VERSE WAS COMPRESSED, LIMITED, STEREO WIDENED,
WITH A CHORUS EFFECT DROPPED ON IT. IS THAT REALLY MY VOCAL
TALENT BEING DISPLAYED OR THE COMPUTERS FX BEING DISPLAYED.

AND WHEN I PERFORM LIVE, WON'T THE FANS BE DISAPPOINTED?
THIS IS HOW I CAN TELL YOU GET NO PLAY OUTSIDE THE WEB.
PEOPLE WHO DO LIVE SHOWS RARELY USE EFFECTS AND ALL THAT PROCESSING EQUIPMENT AS IT WON'T ADD UP TO THE CD WHEN YOU PERFORM LIVE......AND THE FANS........WELL.......THEY WON'T LIKE IT!
(ASHLEE SIMPSON ANYONE :rolleyes: )
 
Back
Top