M
Midlandmorgan
New member
I think there are some differences when several tracks are summed to a mix. I have worked with PT, and currently am set up with Samplitude/Aardvark...I chose this combination strictly because of sound and features. I have done the ol' blind A/B work done here with work done in PT, and 15 of 18 preferred what was done here, with 2 preferring PT. A lot of PT users with whom I am acquainted say that Samp does indeed sound better, but PT seems to be easier to navigate (and its the only thing a lot of clients know of...).
There is a lot of truth to the concept, though, that PT users seem to invest into much higher end gear than non PT users - which gives the impression that PT sounds better, when in fact it is the hardware, convertors, preamps, etc, that actually sound better.
So as far as I can tell, there are vast differences in software, not on the single track level but on the sum/mix level.
Now, if I would talk the Samplitude guys into putting their code onto dedicated cards ala PT, I'd be in heaven.
K
There is a lot of truth to the concept, though, that PT users seem to invest into much higher end gear than non PT users - which gives the impression that PT sounds better, when in fact it is the hardware, convertors, preamps, etc, that actually sound better.
So as far as I can tell, there are vast differences in software, not on the single track level but on the sum/mix level.
Now, if I would talk the Samplitude guys into putting their code onto dedicated cards ala PT, I'd be in heaven.
K