A
alevy
New member
My chain is eq,noise gate,compressor,reverb,then the deesser. Is that the right order.
S
sloop
Active member
alevy said:
I would de-sss before eq. and reverb
ragata
New member
I'd probably do it in this order:
noise-gate -> de-esser -> compressor -> EQ -> reverb
But I wouldn't say that there's a "right order".
noise-gate -> de-esser -> compressor -> EQ -> reverb
But I wouldn't say that there's a "right order".
A
alevy
New member
Great im going to try both. Thanks
Blue Bear Sound
New member
I'd say no.... your "chain" should be different for every context.... if something is not used in a particular application, it has no business being in the chain......alevy said:
bennychico11
...
ragata said:
I'd agree with this, as long as the track needs it. Like Bear said, no need to put it on there if you don't feel it needs it. And I'd put the reverb on an aux track and buss the signal to there prefader.
A
alevy
New member
Thanks I'm on my way home now to try it out.
M
mixsit
Well-known member
Wouldn't you want the compressor before de-ess? My reasoning is to have the larger level changes evened out so the de-ess threshold can be more moderate.
Not that I uses it all that often though...
Wayne
Not that I uses it all that often though...
Wayne
Blue Bear Sound
New member
To work well, the de-esser needs to be able to catch the sibilant peaks... if you compress first, the peaks are far less obvious to the de-esser and it won't be effective....mixsit said:
Last edited:
A
alevy
New member
I Think Thats What Happened To Me.... Thus The Purpose Of This Post. I Had My Threshold Super Low On The Deesser And It Was If It Didnt Effect Anything. It Was Because It Was After The Compressor. Wow. That Makes A Lot Of Sense Now. Lol
ecktronic
Mixing and Mastering.
I would have thought to put the deesser at the end of the chain so that any EQ boosts are caught by the deesser rather than deessing then boosting the EQ and getting sssss's again.
Ive never been able to use the de-esser plug-in well, it just makes my vox sound muddy. I love the de-esser on the Boss BR1180 though!!! it gets rid of sss's really well without changing the tone much.
Ive never been able to use the de-esser plug-in well, it just makes my vox sound muddy. I love the de-esser on the Boss BR1180 though!!! it gets rid of sss's really well without changing the tone much.
bennychico11
...
ecktronic said:
well a desser helps you find the high frequencies....like 7kHz on up. You might not always EQ the vocalist at those frequencies since they usually don't get that high (that's why the sibiliance resides in that area). A general rule I follow....correct before adding. in other words, correct mistakes in the sound before adding effects to boost the sound. You remove sibilance, that annoying ringing noise coming from somewhere, rumbling of the A/C, etc. BEFORE adding EQ to complement the instrument.
wesley tanner
New member
well, I agree to some degree with benny-- but the freq. that a desser reduces aren't always 7k and up. I often use it to smooth out s's lower, around 5k, and not always a shelving thing, often i use a narrower band. listen to just the sidechain (the freq. that you're going to stomp down), find the ones that are the most harsh, and center your desser there. sometimes, you'll find you'll need to use it like a low-pass and bring down all of the higher frequencies.
A
acorec
Banned
Blue Bear Sound said:
BINGO! Give this man a cigar.
ecktronic
Mixing and Mastering.
Good point Bennychico, as usuall.
M
mixsit
Well-known member
Ah yes.. unless you're going for those breathy-sizzle trails in the verb.. Remember that old Andy Williams sound...bennychico11 said:
