Cubase SX 3.1.1 keeps crashing randomly, giving me the "Error"

  • Thread starter Thread starter MistaMash'dup
  • Start date Start date
Seriously - stop talking. Then you might stop embarassing yourself.

If you want to continue to be a criminal, go ahead. But don't expect to be able to talk about it here without people telling you the truth about your illegal activities!

:)
 
noisedude said:
Seriously - stop talking. Then you might stop embarassing yourself.

If you want to continue to be a criminal, go ahead. But don't expect to be able to talk about it here without people telling you the truth about your illegal activities!

:)

The point that I'm trying to make is that the law and economic system are unjust and serve, above all else, the financial interests of the wealthy.

So, if someone scolds me as a "criminal" for violating what I consider to be unjust and exploitative laws, it means little to me other than that the person doing the scolding doesn't understand the economic or legal system in which we live.
 
MistaMash'dup said:
The point that I'm trying to make is that the law and economic system are unjust and serve, above all else, the financial interests of the wealthy.

So, if someone scolds me as a "criminal" for violating what I consider to be unjust and exploitative laws, it means little to me other than that the person doing the scolding doesn't understand the economic or legal system in which we live.
Well, I guess apologies are in order. We were not aware we were in the presence of a regular ol' "Freedom Fighter". Good for you!!! Stick to your guns!!! I think you have noisedude on the run....
 
My bad. I guess that because "the law and economic system are unjust and serve, above all else, the financial interests of the wealthy" that you DO have the right to steal software. I guess that also entitles you to come here and ask for help from the very same people who so obviously support this immoral system.
 
MistaMash'dup said:
The point that I'm trying to make is that the law and economic system are unjust and serve, above all else, the financial interests of the wealthy.

So, if someone scolds me as a "criminal" for violating what I consider to be unjust and exploitative laws, it means little to me other than that the person doing the scolding doesn't understand the economic or legal system in which we live.
Yeah ... as I say, I reckon having to pay for cars is a bit unfair really, so I'm going to go try a few out in a local multi-storey and take whichever I like the most. It's only fair. Is that ok with you?

I mean ... BMW/GM/Ford's owners are all richer than I'll ever be, so I refuse to be exploited any longer.
 
altiris said:
as more become interested in recording and feak out on the price of the software people mostly talk abount here they will look for other ways to get a hold of say SX3. they think that getting the pro version will give them an edge on learning to record or get a better recording. if you look for "recording" on google you will see many references to this site. mostly wannabe musicians who are still living with momm and daddy find this site and want to know how to use software they downloaded from P2P networks.
this could be the best post ever.
 
noisedude said:
Yeah ... as I say, I reckon having to pay for cars is a bit unfair really, so I'm going to go try a few out in a local multi-storey and take whichever I like the most. It's only fair. Is that ok with you?

I mean ... BMW/GM/Ford's owners are all richer than I'll ever be, so I refuse to be exploited any longer.

That's the spirit! You're finally catching on. However, the real question arises once you've expropriated the capital from the rich... and that question is, what are you going to do with that capital? Are you going to use it selfishly, and become a rich exploiter yourself? Or are you going to do better than the rich before you, and distribute that capital such as to create a system in which all people's needs are met.
 
xstatic said:
My bad. I guess that because "the law and economic system are unjust and serve, above all else, the financial interests of the wealthy" that you DO have the right to steal software. I guess that also entitles you to come here and ask for help from the very same people who so obviously support this immoral system.

Given the nature of the software companies, I think so.
 
If you hate the system so much, move to a country that doesn't have it in place. I hear that China is nice this time of year, of course you get executed sometimes for stealing if it is bad enough, but there is no 'horrible' capitalism there. There are loads of countries in Africa with little or no laws. Why not try there?? Maybe you can take some vaccines with you and kill two birds with one stone. Let's hope someone less fortunate than you, with the same values as you, doesn't steal your suitcase on your way out.
 
Another thing, steiny, far from being a huge corporate beast employs about 100 people. Have you asked ANY of their employees whether or not they feel exploited? If not, and you are a 'logical' person, you would then know that you have no business passing judgement on this company.

Take your crack using ass to some other site.
 
Bass Master "K" said:
If you hate the system so much, move to a country that doesn't have it in place. I hear that China is nice this time of year, of course you get executed sometimes for stealing if it is bad enough, but there is no 'horrible' capitalism there. There are loads of countries in Africa with little or no laws. Why not try there?? Maybe you can take some vaccines with you and kill two birds with one stone. Let's hope someone less fortunate than you, with the same values as you, doesn't steal your suitcase on your way out.

Communism has a similar, if not worse, concentration of power compared to Capitalism. I would certainly not want to live under such a system.

In those countries in Africa that have "little or no [formal] laws," there exist power hierarchies, enforced through violence (just as in Capitalist countries, and in Communist countries.) While laws may not be "on the books" in such areas, you can bet your ass that if you do what the powerful don't want you to do, you will likely wind up dead. I do not want to live unders such a system.


As long as the vaccines wind up in the arms of those people who need them to survive, I don't care if someone steals my suitcase.
 
MistaMash'dup said:
Communism has a similar, if not worse, concentration of power compared to Capitalism. I would certainly not want to live under such a system.

In those countries in Africa that have "little or no [formal] laws," there exist power hierarchies, enforced through violence (just as in Capitalist countries, and in Communist countries.) While laws may not be "on the books" in such areas, you can bet your ass that if you do what the powerful don't want you to do, you will likely wind up dead. I do not want to live unders such a system.


As long as the vaccines wind up in the arms of those people who need them to survive, I don't care if someone steals my suitcase.

Oh, wow, then I'll be...that must mean that out of ALL of your worldly choices, a capitalist society seems to be the best out of all your choices. Wow imagine that. Now are you making your society better by your actions, or worse? Exactly.

You still can't even answer my last post. We've seen and heard all the excuses before. They don't serve the betterment of society. If every person of society stole without regret, it would be a disaster. Go. Go somewhere else.
 
MistaMash'dup said:
That's the spirit! You're finally catching on. However, the real question arises once you've expropriated the capital from the rich... and that question is, what are you going to do with that capital? Are you going to use it selfishly, and become a rich exploiter yourself? Or are you going to do better than the rich before you, and distribute that capital such as to create a system in which all people's needs are met.
So no-one pays for anything, and everyone's content? I can see one or two holes in your system here, pal ...... like, the ENTIRE system is a hole ........ and, that little one on the heel of your sock there. That's the two of 'em. :)
 
Bass Master "K" said:
Another thing, steiny, far from being a huge corporate beast employs about 100 people. Have you asked ANY of their employees whether or not they feel exploited? If not, and you are a 'logical' person, you would then know that you have no business passing judgement on this company.

The only reason that I didn't respond to this post was that you were in the process of writing it when I posted my last reply, thus it appeared above my last reply and was thus overlooked.

First of all, let's refute your fallacious assertion.

http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/News/Details.aspx?NewsId=11868

"YAMAHA CORPORATION announced that it has reached a basic agreement to acquire 100% of the common stock of Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH, a division of Pinnacle Systems, Inc., a California-based maker and seller of video editing systems. The acquisition, which includes Steinberg?s US sales operations, took place through closed competitive bidding on December 20, 2004, US local time.

Founded in 1984, Steinberg Media Technologies is the market share leader in computer software used to produce music. Steinberg became part of the Pinnacle Systems Group in January 2003.

In the mid 1990s, YAMAHA forged a relationship with Steinberg by using its computer music products and bundled software. In April 2004, YAMAHA and Steinberg deepened their cooperative relationship with the Studio Connections initiative, a joint-development project to seamlessly integrate YAMAHA?s hardware products with Steinberg?s software.

Now, YAMAHA has reached agreement to acquire all of Steinberg?s common stock through closed competitive bidding. Eying growth in the music creation market and expanded sales of sound equipment, YAMAHA has incorporated Steinberg?s assets, including its strong technical capabilities in software development and intellectual property, into its Group efforts and further strengthened these activities through joint-development projects. Having determined that Steinberg?s competitive capabilities will be very formidable going forward, YAMAHA decided to acquire all of that company?s common stock through participation in closed competitive bidding."


Furthermore, I do not need to ask an employee of a profit generating company whether they feel exploited because, BY DEFINITION, anyone who is an employee of a profit generating company is being exploited by whoever claims ownership of the profits that the company generates (except in the case of upper level management, or in the case of a workers' cooperative. Look it up if you aren’t familiar.) The owners do from very little to nothing, other than collect profits.

Even in the rare case (though increasingly likely with decreasing business size) that the owners actively participate in the work that the company does, the owners are compensated at a higher rate than the employees (assuming that the business is or eventually becomes profitable to a certain extent.)

The only justification made for this higher rate of compensation is that the owner has invested his/her money into the business. However, the owner must have inherited or otherwise had sufficient opportunity to obtain the capital with which to start or acquire the business in the first place. Only a complete ignoramus would assert that such inheritances or opportunities are distributed equally across the human population (I can provide statistics to back this up if you need to see them). Although it is historically true that a handful of poor people have been able to become wealthy by a combination of great luck and ability, one only needs to do some research to find that the vast majority of people who are rich have not risen from the lowest classes.

Therefore, what the owner-employee relationship boils down to is a relationship in which one party (the owner(s)) receives great amounts of compensation for little to no work, justified on the basis (the vast majority of the time) of their being in an advantaged position above their employees, while the employees do most if not all of the work. This is exploitation.
 
Bass Master "K" said:
Oh, wow, then I'll be...that must mean that out of ALL of your worldly choices, a capitalist society seems to be the best out of all your choices. Wow imagine that.

The country that has the highest per capita GDP and which also has the highest rated standard of living is Norway. Norway also happens to be the country with the most anarchosyndicalistic social system in the world.

While Norway is a capitalist country, it is also the most socialist of all the capitalist countries.

You can debate me if you want about why the Norwegians have been so successful, but I'm telling you, the evidence is on my side.
 
noisedude said:
So no-one pays for anything, and everyone's content? I can see one or two holes in your system here, pal ...... like, the ENTIRE system is a hole ........ and, that little one on the heel of your sock there. That's the two of 'em. :)

I'm in no way encouraging people to indiscriminately "steal without regret" or to do no work.

I am encouraging people to steal from rich exploiters and oppressors, with the intent to create a more level society in which all people's needs are met. However, I don't think that this type of action alone is enough to create a more level society where all people's needs are met. If you're curious about the larger picture/plan, I'd recommend doing some research into the concepts collectively referred to as "anarchosyndicalism", AKA libertarian socialism.
 
MistaMash'dup said:
.

I am encouraging people to steal from rich exploiters and oppressors, with the intent to create a more level society in which all people's needs are met.
You belong behind bars.
 
NYMorningstar said:
You belong behind bars.

Why? I think that a much more convincing argument can be made that those people that murder others, either directly, or indirectly by depriving them of the basic necessities required for their continued survival, must be stopped.
 
MistaMash'dup said:
Why? I think that a much more convincing argument can be made that those people that murder others, either directly, or indirectly by depriving them of the basic necessities required for their continued survival, must be stopped.
Why? Simply because you are encouraging people to break the law. Mitigating your actions with those of others is bullshit too.
 
Back
Top