Slouching Raymond
Well-known member
I found them to be similar.
This is clearly an acoustic piano.
Some of the notes were a bit 'ringy', so maybe have too much reverb.
I wonder how much of this is the piano and the room.
It would probably help if you also posted a MIX_0, just the naked recording.
I knew a pianist who had a CD recorded, and insisted on too much reverb, against the advice of the recording engineer.
The result was dripping wet, and I didn't want to subject myself to listening to it a second time.
This is clearly an acoustic piano.
Some of the notes were a bit 'ringy', so maybe have too much reverb.
I wonder how much of this is the piano and the room.
It would probably help if you also posted a MIX_0, just the naked recording.
I knew a pianist who had a CD recorded, and insisted on too much reverb, against the advice of the recording engineer.
The result was dripping wet, and I didn't want to subject myself to listening to it a second time.
rob aylestone
Moderator
Compression in the same sentence as classical piano? Reverb wise they are as Raymond says similar - but if you hadn't said it was real, I would have guessed a good sample package, where the MIDI value crosses the line into the next sample with harder attack - some of the F's leap out and a player would not have played like that, apart from a mistake - the runs don't flow when suddenly a different tone note pops out. Maybe if you have used compression that is not helping. It is a very close perspective - there is reverb, but no room? I've never compressed a classical piece apart from wreck recovery when it was a bad recording. After all, natural decay is what makes a great piano put up against a poor one. What mic technique did you go for, because those changes of timbre are quite obvious?
A
amc252
New member
I agree compression doesn't sit well with classical music piano but, since YouTube audience usually listen on cellphones or earbuds, I wanted to optimize the dymanics for that scenario. I added some light compression to the final mix.
The piano was recorded with 3 pairs of microphones:
Close on the bridge: DPA 4060 omni-directionals
Tail: Schoeps CM62S omni-directionals
Audience perspective: Microtech Gefell M950 Cardioids
On MIX_1, I left the bridge and tail mics dry and added reverb only to the room mics.
On MIX_2, I added a smidgen of reverb separately on each track trying to create a more cohesive sound.
COMPRESSION
MIX_1 THRESHOLD -16 RATIO 2.0 ATTACK 0.2 RELEASE 150
MIX_2 THRESHOLD -20 RATIO 2.5 ATTACK 100 RELEASE 250
The piano was recorded with 3 pairs of microphones:
Close on the bridge: DPA 4060 omni-directionals
Tail: Schoeps CM62S omni-directionals
Audience perspective: Microtech Gefell M950 Cardioids
On MIX_1, I left the bridge and tail mics dry and added reverb only to the room mics.
On MIX_2, I added a smidgen of reverb separately on each track trying to create a more cohesive sound.
COMPRESSION
MIX_1 THRESHOLD -16 RATIO 2.0 ATTACK 0.2 RELEASE 150
MIX_2 THRESHOLD -20 RATIO 2.5 ATTACK 100 RELEASE 250
Last edited:
rob aylestone
Moderator
Got you. I’d like to hear it without compression. Never found YouTube really an issue with lighter classical piano. To my ears so that’s just me, it just sounds close miked with reverb rather than ‘real’ if you know what I mean.
A
amc252
New member
Sure, here is the raw track without reverb or compression.
TRACK_RAW
I appreciate your taking the time to listen to it. I'm fairly new to recording and my ears are nowhere as refined as yours.
elly-d
Member
i liked mix 2 best, sounded a bit softer less bright.
rob aylestone
Moderator
The raw track sounds better but reveals a few things. The mics are too close - so you are hearing more of the hammer sounds and less soundboard. That could be why some notes jump out a bit. I think maybe you've just not found the sweet spots. I have a Yamaha grand, and with the mics close in it sounds quite similar. For noon-pop, If I must close mic, I might also put up a couple of 414's in a ordinary square room - and use something like old AKG451s doing the close mic - but if it's a classical piece of your style, the two 414s on the right hand side sound more 'real'?
Attachments
A
amc252
New member
The raw track sounds better but reveals a few things. The mics are too close - so you are hearing more of the hammer sounds and less soundboard. That could be why some notes jump out a bit. I think maybe you've just not found the sweet spots. I have a Yamaha grand, and with the mics close in it sounds quite similar. For noon-pop, If I must close mic, I might also put up a couple of 414's in a ordinary square room - and use something like old AKG451s doing the close mic - but if it's a classical piece of your style, the two 414s on the right hand side sound more 'real'?
I tried to follow your advice in our evening session. I recorded a short piece placing a pair of DPA 4011 cardioid near the right hand side of the piano, kept the mics at the tail, and raised the audience mics up about 9ft in ORTF.
In retrospect, I think this last move might have been a mistake since they sound brighter but less present than when they were wide and low.
Anyway, here is the raw track.
MIX_4
I tried to follow your advice in our evening session. I recorded a short piece placing a pair of DPA 4011 cardioid near the right hand side of the piano, kept the mics at the tail, and raised the audience mics up about 9ft in ORTF.
In retrospect, I think this last move might have been a mistake since they sound brighter but less present than when they were wide and low.
Anyway, here is the raw track.
MIX_4
Papanate
Well-known member
I think the Mix 4 track sounds more modern - also your playing style makes it sound edited.
Similar threads
