C1 Vocal Tracks

  • Thread starter Thread starter alanhyatt
  • Start date Start date
Every parent thinks their baby is the cutest in the world and the C1 is Alan Hyatt's baby.....
 
Gidge said:
Every parent thinks their baby is the cutest in the world and the C1 is Alan Hyatt's baby.....


Yeah....

I see nothing wrong with this. At least Alan LIKES his mic! MXL mics are good stuff but when do think is the last time an MXL exec even HEARD a v67?!?! (If ever at all:rolleyes: )

That means a lot to me at least even if I only speak for myself.


heylow
 
heylow said:



Yeah....

I see nothing wrong with this. At least Alan LIKES his mic! MXL mics are good stuff but when do think is the last time an MXL exec even HEARD a v67?!?! (If ever at all:rolleyes: )

That means a lot to me at least even if I only speak for myself.


heylow

Thank you heylow

Alan Hyatt
PMI Audio Group
 
i like the c1 alot myself.......All i'm saying (and pretty much ever said) is that it is a HUGE conflict of interest to have Alan commenting on the SP mics other than directly answering a specific technical question.....saying his mic is better than this one and this other mic doesnt do this is just wrong.....

and i think Brent Casey at MXL is just as passionate about his mics.....he just doesnt spam this bbs about it.....
 
I think that asking Alan(or anyone else) to restrict his comments in any way is a violation of their right to free speach.No one on this board should be restricted from expressing themselves unless they do it in a hurtful manner.The only posts that should be deleted are ones that are hateful and even then we should have a right to make that decision ourselves in most cases.I don't want someone making decisions for me.Take the recent shitstorm for example.From the responses it is apparent that the majority of people here support Alan and see no problem.If one of the minority were the moderator and removed Alan's posts because HE felt there was a problem he would depriving the majority of the board of information that they wish to read and that they have no problem with not to mention that Alan has a right to express his opinion.

Fact is that at this point in my life I can usually tell shit from shinola and I really don't need anyone telling me the difference.I don't want anyone doing my thinking for me,you can fall into a shitload of trouble allowing people to do that for you as history can point out.
 
if you can tell shit from shinola, why cant you tell information from advertisement......
 
Gidge,

You are totally entitled to your opinions and I fully respect that, but for fucks' sake, why continue on over this when it appears that even Dragon himself, hasn't deemed it necessary to interfere.

In all honesty, there is always some crap happening somewhere on these forums that could be regarded as offensive (to some), unethical, immoral or possibly even illegal and a lot of it makes any of Alan's posts look pretty insignificant..............I rarely see any of "The Hyatt Police" voicing their opinions in these other areas.

There is a difference between having valid opinions and obsessive paranoia.

:cool:
 
Keep up the good work Alan, even Jesus Christ had to deal with the persecution of having a suporior product. He was even killed by them.But now even 2000 years later the kids still dig him.
 
:rolleyes:

(wishing the informative posts got as long as these bickering threads.....just got done listening to sonixx's drum tracks on another thread....of course no one's responding to that though. Nice to know SOME folks are recording.)
 
Gidge,Peace Bro,I can tell information from advertising,thank you.That was my point.I am old enough to make my own judgements and I do not want anyone making those judgements for me.I sold cars for quite a few years back in the day and I am very capable of knowing a sales pitch when I see one.

If you did not know the relationship of Alan to his company you would no way find Alan's post objectionable but instead find them to contain knowledge and insights into a product(s) that no one else possesses.I know Alan is proud of his products and rightfully so.The people who own and use his products seem to be pretty much universally satisfied,with the exception of the RNC there are very few products that all users like.If I was producing a product,especially one with the value of the RNC,I would be VERY proud of it.If I was trying to "spam" a product,you would never even know you were being sold a bill of goods.

That is really neither here or there I guess.I don't want to get in a pissing contest with you or anyone.I think by the responses to the threads that it is clear that the majority of members do not find Alan's post here to be objectionable.And please don't anyone bring up the term "silent majority".I ate that crap til I choked when Tricky Dick was president. :D
 
ausrock,

i tried to quit, but its an addiction.....seriously, it just gets old......


Randy,

again, if Alan replies to a post asking for information about a mic, i guess it would be ok to answer it here....i think it would be more professional to answer it via email and keep it off the boards...my opinion only.....

if it sticks to just information i have no problem with it (though my thoughts rightfully mean nada here - i dont foot the bill)...but i can say my peace......

but this thread was just a "listen to how great the C1 sounds" by the owner of the company....in essence, an advertisement.....borderline spam, a definite conflict of interest......

and im not trying to make a judgement for you, Randy...im speaking for people who may not know that here is a guy not offering info, but trying to sell a product (they would have to live on another planet to not know)......

Alans posts "contain knowledge and insights into a product(s) that no one else possesses"....where is that in this thread?....call it whatever you want....its an ad.....

if Gidge recommends the C1 and rants and raves about how good it is, it is information......

if Alan recommends the C1 and rants and raves about how good it is, it is an A-D-V-E-R-T-I-S-E-M-E-N-T......
 
I had no idea he had a connection to the mic itself until Gidge pointed it out. Things like that may be easier to detect for some of you who have been here consistently for years (of which I am not one), but if you're new here and looking for useful advice on a mic, the last thing you need is someone who actually sells the mic putting up an ad post disguised as a "hey everybody,... I just "stumbled" across this mic,.. and boy does it record clean.. listen to this" post.

Just my input as a fairly objective observer.

WATYF
 
my point exactly....

btw, ill Western Union the money i paid ya to say that....
 
lol

Thanks...

now,.. how much did we agree on again???

500??

A Grand..??

My short term memory just sucks.. :p

WATYF
 
500 now...

another 500 after you post the thread "WOW! this Marshall MXLv67M sounds better than the C1 for half the price"......
 
***WATYF does his best monotone voice.


*ahem*

wow [shock and amazement],.. this.. Marshall.. [ruffling script sounds in the background] uh... "M.. X... L... v.. 67... M" sounds bet-ter than.. the.. C.. 1.... for.. half... the... price.

It's grrrrrrrrrrrreat.

WATYF


:p

(do I get a little extra for throwin' the "it's grrrrreat" in there???)
 
Gidge said:


but this thread was just a "listen to how great the C1 sounds" by the owner of the company....in essence, an advertisement.....borderline spam, a definite conflict of interest......


Gidge, the post said; "I was on the Sonar BBS and came across this for "anyone who may be interested". It is a bit compressed and pitch corrected, but the vocal track was pretty clean, and all done on a C1".

How your read it to claim I said the C1, "sounded great by the owner of the company" is beyond me. You see on every Studio Projects thread ever done, you comment in some negative way towards me. Everyone here knows this, so you can't deny it.

It is only now that I realize you are actually trying to bait me into attacking you by saying something bad, like "your a stupid asshole"... or something of that nature so that everyone will bag on me for calling you names, but let me clue you in Gidge, I will not do that no matter how hard you try to bait me...so stop trying to get me to do it. :mad:

If you really think about it, you are really a much bigger Spammer than I am, because you always post how much better a Marshall is than the Studio Projects mics for half the cost. Your always forcing people to listen to your opinions, but did you ever wonder why Marshall now sells their mics for so little after selling them for so much until I entered the picture? No, I guess you would not.

Anyway I make it very clear when I post as myself because I always leave off the PMI Audio Group tag. When I post as the owner of the company, I clearly sign off with the PMI Audio Group tag. Maybe you would care to go back and look at all the threads again so you know that this is what I do, or did you forget that even after Harvey told you. This clearly seperates me and my companies personal opinions from posts I make. Or would you and the others prefer I lie, sign on with new dumb name and get on all your threads and bag you and Marshall. At least I use my real name partner, and I tell it like it is. I also don't bag you or Marshall.

So keep on truckin there Gidgey ole boy. Keep knocking anyone on this thread that likes the Studio Projects mics. All you do is push them towards it and further away from your house brand when you do what you do.

Like everyone has already said, they know me and they can make up their own minds about what I say. They don't need to be told or directed by you and your cult followers as to how to think. After all, they have opinions too. If you think it is old, it is certianly old for all these guys on this group that have to listen to you bag me all the time. Truth be told, I would think they would prefer my being here than you. At least with me, they know what they get :D

Alan Hyatt
 
Need info on mics -
give me more info
gidge - let me know why I should buy Marshall, or basically any other mic...need that info
alan - no need to aplogize - keep the info coming...
need more info

we'll make up our minds
need more info
less whatever it is this turned into

With all due respect to all parties
let's make some music and
get more info
 
Mr. Hyatt,

pl-eeze....why would i try to bait you into calling me names.....9 out of 10 will agree with you im an asshole.....(1 being my wife).....

me a spammer?....hardly....i have no financial ties or personal gain with Marshall Electronics so that is impossible.....

why is Marshall selling their mics for so much less?....i never noticed that......Mars is selling the v67M for alot cheaper, but everywhere else on the V67G, they are pretty much selling in the $175-$200 range which is hardly cheaper.....you know this and i know this, so dont even try to make it look like Marshall is having to drop prices to compete.....

whether you tag your company or not, you cant separate yourself from it....this thread shows it, IMO......

use my real name....how many people here really use their real name....but none-the-less, i have signed off posts using my real name before, nothingto hide....as in Mike Guidry (as in Gidge-ry)......

ive never bashed you and especially never bashed Studio Projects mics....in fact, ive recommended the C1 right along side the v67 at least 90% of the time.....ive bashed your tactics, and that is all......

i really dont care who people prefer be here.....those that prefer you and constantly lick your ass can kiss mine if they dont like my posts.....



To Patty David,

I had the opportunity to use the C1 right along side my v67...to my very untrained ears they sounded identical....other trained ears have noted that they are VERY similar in sound (Harvey Gerst is one) and would be happy with either.....you cant go wrong with either the C1 or the v67.....but at half the price and as good a sound, i have to choose the v67M.......
 
Back
Top