
Speeddemon
New member
I ain't dissin tha Bear, foo'!NYMorningstar said:I'm with the Bear all the way on this one. He is making a point that alot of you want to ignore. Miking a good amp is always going to be better than a simulated sound of that particular amp. And just because you don't have the convenience of using a real amp and the amp modelers work better for you, that does not translate to them being better.
It's all rather simple. You are going to have the best sound from the real thing. That's why you don't see simulators being used by headline acts. Sure variety is the spice of life but some spices are better than others.
So instead of dissin the Bear, you should respect his experience and take his advice.
Maybe you is gonna re-read this part I wrote:
originally posted by Speeddemon
Im tired of people saying that an amp sim is nowhere near a great tube amp.
Think of this:
-convenience
-cost
Yes, a $3000 Bogner, miced with a $1500 Royer R121 through a $3000 Neve 1073 pre WILL sound great, IF done by a great engineer...
Can you crank the Bogner at 2am on your attic, when you have neighbours? No.
Does the whole mic, cable, tube amp, mic pre-enchillada cost less than $600 (price of Sansamp PSA-1)? No.
Does Joe Average hear the difference once it's on a CD? No.
Do you have the skills now to mic a great amp well with a great mic? Maybe.
I see 3 no's and 1 maybe. Answer=Digitech Genesis 3. (or POD, if you prefer a 'dirtier' sound...
Most of us can afford a SM57 (or maybe a MD421), a Peavey Deluxe Tube amp (or whatever it's called) and a Joemeek or an Audiobuddy. I'll guarantee that the sound from a Genesis 3 will be better than that beginner's set-up. No offense, but you guys gotta stop comparing apples with oranges.