
Bobbsy
Boring Old Git
I was once told that "forum threads that stay strictly on topic die a quick death".
Is it ? The OP asks "does anyone else use reverb on vocals while tracking ?". Well you either do or you don't, it's kind of a yes or no answer, really, not a great deal of discussion can be had.........unless people start to point out why they do it which then leads to others saying why they don't which then leads to someone pointing out something or other about reverb which then opens up the subject of reverb which then leads to where we currently are !
That's sometimes the nature of conversations, even on the internet. It just goes to show how interelated different things can be and how one thing can spark off something else.
Or maybe many of us are just rubbish at answering a question briefly and sticking to the subject.........
Out of interest, does anyone else just mute their vocals?
A guy I work with can't get enough vocal in the headphones and I have to keep latency down for him, but for me, I always mute the vocal track and keep one side of the headphones off.
Maybe it's just cos I'm always tracking vocals to a sparse arrangement, where everything will be tweaked around the vocal?
(As an aside, this is one area where I love my Yammy digital mixer. Push one button and the faders become the aux sends, allowing me the easiest way in the world to "mix" the headphone feed.)
You interrupted this conversation for that?![]()
Rright. Of course. What was I thinking?Fixed that for ya.![]()
I was once told that "forum threads that stay strictly on topic die a quick death".
I was once told that "forum threads that stay strictly on topic die a quick death".
Then this is the exception that proves the rule. Once it became about using reverb in a mix instead of using reverb in monitors it became boring and generic.
.well, there's not really much to discuss, either you do or don't. I mean, there's not a heck of a lot of technique to talk about or application. It's mainly a do or don't thing.