All encoders are not created equal!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slackmaster2K
  • Start date Start date
Slackmaster2K

Slackmaster2K

Gone
I think this might have been discussed before but...

Man, I've been using BladeEnc for creating mp3s because it's free and is integrated with n-Track. I figured that there couldn't be enough of a difference between various freeware encoders to really warrant my time investigating them.

Well, let me tell you that Blade sucks...at least with my music. I downloaded SCMPX and man, what a difference! The ride actually sounds like a ride! The hihat doesn't get washed out! At 128kbps SCMPX encoded mp3's are so much clearer than those created with Blade.

I'm so glad I found this out since I'm going to be adding another song to my mp3.com page today. I just wish I had known this before I posted the Window. Live 'n learn!

Off hand I can't remember where I found SCMPX, but it's out there and easy to find with minimal searching. If you're using Blade then please check it out. I should probably post this in the n-Track group...

Slackmaster 2000
 
I use Winamp (with a plug-in) to go mp3 to wav and Audiograbber (via the Fraunhofer IIs codec) for wav to mp3 with what seem to be great results. Takes a few minutes to mp3 encode but I'm assuming that's to be expected.
 
One reason which blade may sound inferior at 128kb/s: it was designed with higher bitrates in mind. Try encoding something with blade at 256kb/s, and the same with SCMPX, and compare. Might be worth checking out, butI've been known to be wrong before.

Good luck!

William Underwood
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top