Wave Field Synthesis and Holophony

  • Thread starter Thread starter syntheticwave
  • Start date Start date
S

syntheticwave

New member
Hi,

anyone in this forum expirienced in Wave Field Synthesis or Holophony Topic?
I would like to argue the advantages and disadvantages.
 
Hi Rami,

you have listened such audio presentation?
For which reason your expirience was negative?
 
RAMI said:
Nah, I have no idea what either of us is talking about.
Click to expand...
...let us change it. It is a very interesting topic in audio range. The principle is old, was described in 1989 first time.

In the traditional audio, we are faced at the problem, the spatial sonic is not described completely by the signal difference between some points in space, say audio channels.
However, completely describes the spatial distribution of the mirror sources, caused from recording room reflections, the spatial audio. The simple idea behind the WFS and Holophony principle is, restore that genuine distribution from the information regarding the recording room reflective properties at the playback site during synthesis.

All we need is that information and the pure (dry mono recorded) source signal. That's feasible today and realized in practice. It solves a lot of recording problems. And also the unsolvable task in traditional audio, subtract the playback room acoustics from the transmitting chain become feasible in the Holophony approach. I think, that will be the future in audio, and the future arrives fast, still. You should read the Wikipedia Wave Field Synthesis page for more information.
 
syntheticwave said:
...let us change it. It is a very interesting topic in audio range. The principle is old, was described in 1989 first time.

In the traditional audio, we are faced at the problem, the spatial sonic is not described completely by the signal difference between some points in space, say audio channels.
However, completely describes the spatial distribution of the mirror sources, caused from recording room reflections, the spatial audio. The simple idea behind the WFS and Holophony principle is, restore that genuine distribution from the information regarding the recording room reflective properties at the playback site during synthesis.

All we need is that information and the pure (dry mono recorded) source signal. That's feasible today and realized in practice. It solves a lot of recording problems. And also the unsolvable task in traditional audio, subtract the playback room acoustics from the transmitting chain become feasible in the Holophony approach. I think, that will be the future in audio, and the future arrives fast, still. You should read the Wikipedia Wave Field Synthesis page for more information.
Click to expand...

Ah well. Why didn't you say so in the first place?

In that case, I'm all for it.!!!!
 
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to kcearl again.

:D
 
syntheticwave said:
...let us change it. It is a very interesting topic in audio range. The principle is old, was described in 1989 first time.

In the traditional audio, we are faced at the problem, the spatial sonic is not described completely by the signal difference between some points in space, say audio channels.
However, completely describes the spatial distribution of the mirror sources, caused from recording room reflections, the spatial audio. The simple idea behind the WFS and Holophony principle is, restore that genuine distribution from the information regarding the recording room reflective properties at the playback site during synthesis.

All we need is that information and the pure (dry mono recorded) source signal. That's feasible today and realized in practice. It solves a lot of recording problems. And also the unsolvable task in traditional audio, subtract the playback room acoustics from the transmitting chain become feasible in the Holophony approach. I think, that will be the future in audio, and the future arrives fast, still. You should read the Wikipedia Wave Field Synthesis page for more information.
Click to expand...

Sounds like a solution in search of a problem.
 
interesting, thank you but i couldnt even begin to argue on this topic

as like vision its our brains putting it all together, i posted the virtual barbershop mp3 on my FB, and just like "im sitting in a room", noone gave a damn:(
 
Almost everything has left me confused in this thread.
Mind you, whatever the future of audio is, as long as I can play my stuff on it and listen happilly and I'm not deaf, it's cool with me. And KCearl.
 
grimtraveller said:
Almost everything has left me confused in this thread.
Mind you, whatever the future of audio is, as long as I can play my stuff on it and listen happilly and I'm not deaf, it's cool with me. And KCearl.
Click to expand...

:confused: Me too! Unless we are slamming drummers. :D

And it's funny when people slam drummers. I can play a lot of instrument but when it comes to drums ... I fail.
That's when my appreciation for drummers come into affect.
 
drummers are the keyboardists of the percussion world.....
 
Great. That's all I needed. Now to go buy 3674 pairs of monitors and I should just about have it covered.
Loan me some money, Rami. You're loaded.















You've got money too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top