how come home recording morons

  • Thread starter Thread starter sweetnubs
  • Start date Start date
blimphead.jpg
 
I am dealing with some extreme water damage problems in my house, obviously unexpected, and I'm about $10,000 in on the repairs now. Since that comes out to about 1/4th what I make in a year, and I just spent $5,000 on tree removal and repairs to the deck after a storm brought my cottonwood down on top of me, I am looking for any and everything I can do to help pay for it.

So...I'm going to be selling my Neumann soon, taking half the money and putting it towards the housing expenses and using the other half to buy a replacement mic. Whatever mic I end up getting, I'm going to learn to love it and yeah, I'll probably be really annoyed when someone tells me "You should save up for a Neumann, they sound way better than that."

You sure that your homeowner's policy shouldn't be kicking in here somewhere? Ten large for water damage and no insurance?
 
Sorry to hear about your troubles. If you're serious about the mic situation, when the time comes look in to a Joly modded Oktava. It's the mic that'll make you say "I'm glad I didn't spend all that dough on a Neumann".

Which Oktava and what mod???
 
219 or 319 with the PE (Premium Electronics) mods. I've got an old 219 that I've got to send in!

Cool thanx!!! I'll look into that.
Personaly I dig the old Sun sound but I'm turning into a mic junkie....any 12 steps????:D
 
The point is moot...

...when you consider that a GREAT song recorded on a cheap, Radio Shack mic is ALWAYS better than a mediocre song recorded on your prized mic. Sure, on first listen a person might be impressed with the quality of a sound but beyond that if the song doesn't inspire it won't matter because the audience isn't listening.

Create and support great music first. Lust after, go in debt to buy and defend your precious gear as a very distant third. And what comes second? Getting a better attitude ;)

PS - It's been said that those who don't know are the ones who become teachers. Those who can't create are the ones who __________ (fill in the blank).
 
...I am a registered republican, and I believe in God and eat meat. I also think that there is life out there but don't think that any UFO's (from other planets) have visited this planet. And I think that prisoners being held for terrorism should get some sort of trial from some entity outside of our military. There should be some here that we disagree about.:D

You're a republican and you believe in a fair (or unbiased) trial for suspected terrists?

Wow. Right on. All the ones that I have met are of the "guilty if accused" sort. Then again, most of the dems I have met are, also... Weird.
 
can debate over and over which lame ass cheap microphone sounds the best but then they get incensed when someone says their vintage u-67 sounds better them all of them. Sorry it does and dem is da facks!!!

On the right source, am SM57 sounds better than a vintage U-67.
 
When's the last time you used a U67?? or a U47 or anything else in that league?

Close to 10 years ago. I have used most of the top end mics in my time. I now am a home recordist only and only record myself and friends.

And, on the right source, an SM57 will sound better than a U67.
 
Close to 10 years ago. I have used most of the top end mics in my time. I now am a home recordist only and only record myself and friends.

And, on the right source, an SM57 will sound better than a U67.

Shocking, but true! It's a staple for a reason, and it has its place. (And in that place, it excels.)
 
can debate over and over which lame ass cheap microphone sounds the best but then they get incensed when someone says their vintage u-67 sounds better them all of them. Sorry it does and dem is da facks!!!

Congradulations, you've graduated to Gearslutz! :)
 
Many agree that a $100.00 ACM-6802 sounds better than a $4000.00 AKG C-12 (VR)
 
Many agree that a $100.00 ACM-6802 sounds better than a $4000.00 AKG C-12 (VR)

I've been able to make much better recordings with a 6802 than and AKG C-12. (of course, I've actually been able to make recordings with a 6802--and I've never even used a C-12 :p)
 
Many agree that a $100.00 ACM-6802 sounds better than a $4000.00 AKG C-12 (VR)


Depends on the source. The AKG will sound better than the ACM on a favorable source.

It totally depends on how the mic flatters (or does not) the sound. The difference between any 2 mics is how the mic changes the sound. All mics color the sound, just depends on how much and if it is a desireable change. That is why I hate mic shootouts because on that 1 source, ANY mic could win. If this is not true, then I would believe that people should only own 1 type of mic and be done with it (cheap or not).
 
Depends on the source. The AKG will sound better than the ACM on a favorable source.

It totally depends on how the mic flatters (or does not) the sound. The difference between any 2 mics is how the mic changes the sound. All mics color the sound, just depends on how much and if it is a desireable change. That is why I hate mic shootouts because on that 1 source, ANY mic could win. If this is not true, then I would believe that people should only own 1 type of mic and be done with it (cheap or not).

I know, but I once got the "VR" in hopes of the quality of the original C-12, and like many, was VERY disappointed. I too hate mic-shoot outs.
 
Many agree that a $100.00 ACM-6802 sounds better than a $4000.00 AKG C-12 (VR)

man... how did they get that one so wrong? i've never read anything remotely good about the c-12 vr. you figure that for the price they're selling them for that they could have done a better job of recreating the old c-12 capsule. i've been told that the circuit is pretty simple-- iirc the nady tcm 1050/1150 / apex 460 circuit (aka the telefunken m-16 mk 1 circuit) is pretty much a copy of the c-12 with a few adjustments.
 
man... how did they get that one so wrong? i've never read anything remotely good about the c-12 vr. you figure that for the price they're selling them for that they could have done a better job of recreating the old c-12 capsule. i've been told that the circuit is pretty simple-- iirc the nady tcm 1050/1150 / apex 460 circuit (aka the telefunken m-16 mk 1 circuit) is pretty much a copy of the c-12 with a few adjustments.

That's really what it boils down to. The teflon capsule just does not sound as good as the brass multi-chambered capsule. You would think that AKG would get this after so many years and experts talking and complaining, but no. So they end up selling mics like the C12VR and "The tube" based pretty much on the name alone. I've heard engineers call them expensive door stops.
 
I've been able to make much better recordings with a 6802 than and AKG C-12. (of course, I've actually been able to make recordings with a 6802--and I've never even used a C-12 :p)

That's because you spent all your money on bass traps. :D
 
Back
Top