pandamonk
Well-known member
...On high frequencies. They leave low and mid to boom though.And mover's blankets are even less expensive, and work beautifully!
...On high frequencies. They leave low and mid to boom though.And mover's blankets are even less expensive, and work beautifully!
...On high frequencies. They leave low and mid to boom though.
10 for $100? I can get 10 for £20($40).
10 for $100? I can get 10 for £20($40).
I don't doubt it, but I haven't had that issue [bass problems] in my space.
Wanna bet?
I've never seen a domestic size room that didn't need plenty of bass trapping. Have you ever measured your room's LF response? Try it, you'll see.
--Ethan
I agree that for tracking then any dampening can help(reduce "echo") even thought you'll still have the same bass problems. But for mixing, it's not a good idea.I don't doubt it, but I haven't had that issue in my space.
Johnny Cash was recorded by Rick Rubin in a livingroom with Persian carpets draped around!
For monitoring, I think a lot of expense can be saved (and perhaps impossible expectations left aside) by simply monitoring mixes at lower to mid volume, with the monitors placed away from weird corners, or not too close to walls. I doubt my space is anywhere near perfect, but I can successfully record/mix for professional broadcast without having spent more than $50. for "treatment.
Hah! sorry about that. I doubt you were ripped off, i just found a great deal, half by accident though. It depends what product you buy also. OC703 is a lot more expensive than other similar products.Thanks Man, Now I feel ripped-off. lol.
Cheers,
It's very simple. There is a great site, bobgolds, which has a huge list of absorption coefficients.anybody know how the roxul rockboard 60 compares to OC 703?
Glad to be of help thenThanks that was exactly what I was looking for!