Is this an acceptable practice???

  • Thread starter Thread starter solo2racr
  • Start date Start date
solo2racr

solo2racr

SUCK, SQUEEZE, BANG, BLOW
I was just wondering if this is a good thing to do or not. After treating your studio, is it OK to EQ your monitors for a flatter response?:confused:

I'm thinking along the lines of using a calibrated mic patched into the 1/3 oct. RTA software on my DAW, position the mic at my ear level when I'm seated on my chair, feed the monitors pink noise, and correct the offending freq.

Any thoughts????????
 
Personally, if it were me I would not want to do this unless I had top notch gear and knowledge throughout the signal chain. Also, the whole "flat" thing in studio monitors seems to be a little skewed by a lot of people. If "flat" were truly the way to go, we would all have the same monitors, or all monitors would sound the same. There are many other factors that play in what a good monitoring environment contains. Not all of that is even the monitors themselves.
 
I'm thinking along the lines of using a calibrated mic patched into the 1/3 oct. RTA software on my DAW, position the mic at my ear level when I'm seated on my chair, feed the monitors pink noise, and correct the offending freq.
There are several problems with this, but the main ones are that:

a) the EQ can tend to add it's own coloration to the monitor mix that doesn't exist in the actual mix. This could make translation by your ears just that much more complicated. The more you have to push the EQ, the more of an issue this can be.

b) some frequency response issues are a property of the room itslelf and cannot be addressed by EQ, especially in the bass frequencies. Let's say, for example, that you have at your ear position a huge null mode cancellation at 72-75 Hz (just to pull numbers for example.) That cancellation is going to happen regardless of the amplitude of the signal at those frequencies; no matter how much you boost your EQ, those wavelengths will still tend to cancel at that listening position.

c) if you have such problems at the frequencies mentioned above, even a 1/3rd octave EQ is only going to strike a glancing blow at them at best, and affect those frequencies that maybe there are no problems; the closest band centers on a 1/3rd octave EQ are at 63Hz and 80Hz. More generally, the "resolution" of the uneven-ness in your room's response is likely to be higher than the resolution of your EQ, trying to flatten it can be like trying to flatten an air bubble under plastic. Push it down here and it can pop up next door.

Get your room as good as you physically and economically can and learn to translate from there, and you should be just fine.

G.
 
Well that answers that question. The only other thing I can think of to do to check the mix is to render it to a CD and play it in every player I can find and LISTEN!! If I do have something weird going on, different speakers/monitor in different rooms should bring it out.
 
The mroe you start referncing your mixes in other systems, the quicker you will learn your monitors and room. Once this starts to happen you will find yourself relying less and less on referencing your mixes elsewhere, but the occasional reference is still a great thing:)
 
Well that answers that question. The only other thing I can think of to do to check the mix is to render it to a CD and play it in every player I can find and LISTEN!! If I do have something weird going on, different speakers/monitor in different rooms should bring it out.

This is exactly right. It's time consuming, but probably the best education you could give yourself about how mixes translate.
 
Back
Top