X
XLR
______
And I'm gonna ring up David to do it as a collab.
Thats only my perspective on this hobby which is one of a few I have...I might not even be doing this in 6 months..
1. because the software costs $ and can be used over and over again whereas the guy costs $$$ and has to get $$$ each time
2.i dont need a perfectly finished copy to post on soundclick/myspace/reverbnation/facebook or the MP3 clinic...
3.i like to write songs or tunes for my own amusement...if someone was to say to me "thats great, someone would buy that" then Id track properly in a studio and pay an engineer..
I understand your point but Glen's point is valid too. If you desire to be proficient at being an audio engineer then all these short cuts are not good. It's kinda along the same lines as why peeps working the cash register can't count change on their own. They depend too much on gadgets. Can someone do the car analogy on this?damn I opened it
1. because the software costs $ and can be used over and over again whereas the guy costs $$$ and has to get $$$ each time
2.i dont need a perfectly finished copy to post on soundclick/myspace/reverbnation/facebook or the MP3 clinic...
3.i like to write songs or tunes for my own amusement...if someone was to say to me "thats great, someone would buy that" then Id track properly in a studio and pay an engineer..
I take my bikes on racetracks...I have no wish to ever race Rossi...I dont even race the other guys...I improve my times...
I snowboard down steeper peaks each season..I have no intention of being in the X games or making a snowboarding film...
I knit sweaters of ever increasing thickness....I dont even live somewhere cold!
Thats only my perspective on this hobby which is one of a few I have...I might not even be doing this in 6 months..i might run out of brilliant drum patterns![]()
At which point you'll realize what a waste it was to even bother getting, let alone learning to use, Hair-Ball and auto-mix, even if it is only one click. When you have David working with you, software like that will seem laughable.And I'm gonna ring up David to do it as a collab.
I understand your point but Glen's point is valid too. If you desire to be proficient at being an audio engineer then all these short cuts are not good. It's kinda along the same lines as why peeps working the cash register can't count change on their own. They depend too much on gadgets. Can someone do the car analogy on this?![]()
At this point, words fail me.At which point you'll realize what a waste it was to even bother getting, let alone learning to use, Hair-Ball and auto-mix, even if it is only one click. When you have David working with you, software like that will seem laughable.
A lot of them do have delusions though and these products also have the potential of holding them back.A lot of them also have no serious delusions of commercial success, and just want to quickly, cheaply, and easily make something that doesn't sound too bad.
Now KC that would be sad....
![]()
This is really the market niche they're shooting for. I don't know too many pro engineers who will mix everything you throw at them for a flat one-time $69 fee. If you're recording music because you think making songs is fun, you're probably not so hung up on the quality of the mix, and you're probably not expecting to sell a whole bunch of them. If it's just for personal enjoyment, what's the harm?
I understand your point but Glen's point is valid too. If you desire to be proficient at being an audio engineer then all these short cuts are not good. It's kinda along the same lines as why peeps working the cash register can't count change on their own. They depend too much on gadgets. Can someone do the car analogy on this?![]()
well i am superior to most people, and can.No. And most people can't.
first of all, you don't know what kind of result he will get. secondly, maybe he just wants to get something useable from the tracks he laid down without the hassle of mixing it. perhaps to show potential bandmates of how the song might sound.But take the guy who is writing, playing, tracking and working 40 hrs a week. What is the most he will get out of software like this (and Ozone, and Harbal, and...)? He will get false hope, spin his wheels, and waste his time for a bland result.
the hobby is writing and recording songs, not getting a stellar engineering and mixing masterpiecce.It would seem to me that software that claims to do your hobby for you would suck all the fun out of it quicker than anything else.
A lot of them do have delusions though and these products also have the potential of holding them back.
Well written review.HMHS review said:EZMix is a liberating and at the same time frustrating product. It's a product that will be perfect for some and will drive others crazy with it's limitations...
OK that does it.
Even though I almost never use broadband compression or even EQ, I'm gonna buy this sucker and use it just to piss you dopes off.And, even better, I'm going to use it to mix a classical ensemble. It'll be phat and in your face.
I'm buying Har Bal too.
do you even play music? serious question. i know you work on the production side of it, but i have no idea if you possess the talent to play an instrument, let alone write a song.