R
rock995
New member
Ok, gotta start sometime...here goes post #1: I'm interested in Sonar vs Home Studio, but this could probably apply to VST and Emagic "pro" and "beginner" programs...
Since I know nothing, zero, nada about all this stuff but am a quick learn, I'm wondering if starting out in the Lite program such as Cakewalk Home Studio with the (perhaps incorrect?)
asumption that the learning curve on the cheap version would be
easier to learn and burn than with the expensive one.W ould the eventual switch to the pro program require a return-to-square-one transition when I eventually move on up?
Take the Sonar vs Home Studio question. The new Home Studio works with "Acidized" loops, right? It may be able to hold its own up to a point soundwise and be a lot easier on the newbie brain to figure out. Yes? No?
Any thoughts on the other two companies (Steinberg and Emagic) comparing the beginner vs pro programs with regard to learning curve and eventual upgrade ease? Would PG's Powertracks be a lo-cost contendah?
Thanks very much,
Rock
Since I know nothing, zero, nada about all this stuff but am a quick learn, I'm wondering if starting out in the Lite program such as Cakewalk Home Studio with the (perhaps incorrect?)
asumption that the learning curve on the cheap version would be
easier to learn and burn than with the expensive one.W ould the eventual switch to the pro program require a return-to-square-one transition when I eventually move on up?
Take the Sonar vs Home Studio question. The new Home Studio works with "Acidized" loops, right? It may be able to hold its own up to a point soundwise and be a lot easier on the newbie brain to figure out. Yes? No?
Any thoughts on the other two companies (Steinberg and Emagic) comparing the beginner vs pro programs with regard to learning curve and eventual upgrade ease? Would PG's Powertracks be a lo-cost contendah?
Thanks very much,
Rock