NegadivOne
Alchemy slut
Well I for one would be lost without DI technology. I use my guitarport for all my guitarwork. Ive never been able to get a good sound by mic amping, mainly because I dont have a good sounding amp.
The guitar port is an amp simulator, it's not the same thing as a DI box.NegadivOne said:Well I for one would be lost without DI technology. I use my guitarport for all my guitarwork. Ive never been able to get a good sound by mic amping, mainly because I dont have a good sounding amp.
Farview said:The guitar port is an amp simulator, it's not the same thing as a DI box.

As a bass player, I've never wanted to kill a man more then every time a sound guy wals over to me with a DI box when I'm ttrying to get my amp tone where I want it. Hey dick, I spent $600 on this stack, I'm using it!!!
Let me be very, very clear. These guys put the ick in dick. Most bands are a pain in the ass in one way or another, that's normal. These clowns were so over the top, it just needed to happen.Adam P said:While I don't think that a band should be "condescending pricks" to the soundman, or anyone else directly involved with the production of the show, I don't think that being underhanded and intentionally trying to induce the band into a bad performance does any more for the situation. Everyone's in it together. If the bands weren't showing up to play the venue, the soundman would be out of a job (not to mention the promoter, and possibly the venue owner). I know of people who wouldn't play a venue because of poor sound or a meddlesome soundman. So, I think that for a professional soundman to vindictively attempt to coerce a band into performing poorly reeks of classlessness. This is way off the topic of DI boxes, though, so whatever.

why did you call him a dick and then make fun of his amp?
You need to run it through a passive direct box backwards. You will need to get a 1/4 to female xlr cable to do this. You will also need to have a way to control the volume of the output into the amp. You won't smoke anything if you don't, but it won't sound very good.Ironklad Audio said:edit: and a quick question about re-amping: is there anything that needs to be done impedance/level-wise when running a DI signal from an unbalanced send on a mixer into a guitar amplifier? my assumption would be that the unbalanced send is going to be a lot hotter and have a lower impedance than what the amplifier is expecting - or does it not really matter? i have a few DI guitar tracks that i would love to reamp through something rather than using emulator plugins, but i don't much feel like torching my amp's innards - i've been down that road once before, and it sucked ass.
ggunn said:A DI box is a tool, just as a screwdriver is a tool. I don't hate screwdrivers, but I hate it when I need a hammer and a screwdriver is all I have.
DI's are great for live keyboards and (maybe) bass, but mic my guitar amp, please.
In fact, my first signature was a dbx 166xl and a dbx 266xl. I change it to show the pic in this post.treymonfauntre said:who else thinks its hilarious that this guy's first post is from 5 days ago saying "i just bought a behringer ultra-g" and his signature is already a picture of it saying its great
Sillyhat said:Too many people treat the soundguy like the enemy, which is the dumbest thing you can do. He is the guy that can make you sound great or sound like shit.
When I was running live sound, every once in a while a band would really be a bunch of condecending dicks. If you pissed me off enough, I would run the vocals in the monitors through a pitch shifter set a 600 cents sharp, or I would run the drum monitor through a 50ms delay.
Farview said:You need to run it through a passive direct box backwards. You will need to get a 1/4 to female xlr cable to do this. You will also need to have a way to control the volume of the output into the amp. You won't smoke anything if you don't, but it won't sound very good.