
Light
New member
Yeah this argument is just as pointless as the analog vs. digital one.
No, this is quite different. This is simply bad design. Given what is available to them in manufacturing this amp, they could easily fix these problems. But it would cost more money. This isn't a "oh, I don't like the way that sounds" thing. This is a, "what the fuck, why doesn't this thing WORK" thing.
Yeah, old Fenders distort (thank god), and yes that was not the intent - but they were doing the best they could with what was available at the time. But while they may distort, they don't go into uncontrolled oscillation. This is different. This could be fixed by without loosing anything by simply spending a couple of bucks on shielded cable inside the amp, a larger box, and doing getting rid of the PC board mounted tube sockets. This would add a bit to the parts cost, and a bit more to the cost of labor (you can't solder chassis mounted tube sockets with a wave soldering machine, you have to do them by hand). A few simple (but slightly more expensive) changes to the design, and you would have the same amp - but it would actually work right no matter where you set the knobs. It would still be a pretty boring amp (to my ears), but at least it would WORK.
Bad design is bad design, even if the final product has some useful modes of operation. If the only way to get the amp to do what they wanted it to do was to have these issues, that's one thing. This isn't that. This is lazy, sloppy, BAD design.
Light
"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi