Which verion is best, and why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fishmed
  • Start date Start date

Which version is best? (See details below before voting)

  • Version 1

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Version 2

    Votes: 2 100.0%
  • Version 3

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
Fishmed

Fishmed

Well-known member
I would like to know what the majority AE thinks about these mixes. I have my own opinions, but I want to see how they validate with the folks here. There are three versions of the same songs, what I would like to know is whcih ones sounds the best. What I am looking for is more on the TECHNICAL side than the arrangements, but all comments are welcomed. I will hold my thoughts until there have been several posts; I would not want to influnce the ears that listen.

Version 1

Version 2

Version 3

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Ok, looks like I'm first

Not really my genre, but it's a descent piece. The first cut is dead, nothing to it. The second grabs you--vocals are a bit buried, but that goes with the style of the piece. The third the vocals are over-processed for me. Some will probably like the third mix, it just isn't my thing.
 
Cool tune

I voted for cut number two.
The first was toast.
The third one was excellent except for those cymbals - they were killing me by the end of the tune. I think I liked everything else about three - moreso than number two - but the cymbals wiped me out - especially the half-closed hi-hat - ouch.
Intersting experiment - I'm anxious to see the results and the reasoning behind it. BUT.....it's a very cool tune - liked it a lot - band sounds tight - how comes I didn't know y'all when I lived in Mississippi?
Milan
 
I'll be downloading it tonight.

But the bigger question is...

WHERE THE HECK YOU BEEN, FISHMED???


You've been gone long enough that this better be a genius of work, ala Brian Wilson.


:D
VI


(Welcome back...)
 
#1 just sounds bad. I didn't like the snare on #2. I vote #3.
 
Here is the low-down:

These are in fact three different recordings of relatively the same song.

- Track one was done live. I don’t know who did it, and with what; I just got the file from the band. I thought it would be nice to have more to choose from. I did not expect much from that mix.

- Track two was also live. I recorded the band as a guinea pig experiment of how well my live recording skills would pan out. Because the band did not pay for the recording, they did not give me much of a sound check, so I had to go with a hit-or-miss setup. BTW, the room the show was in is VERY small, so I had to contend with serious mic bleeding and bad acoustics. Not that I am complaining, just something I had to deal with. Although the bass was recorded direct, it did bleed to other mics. I mic’ed the guitar, but it had too much bleed that I did not use it in the mix, so I used my backup, a GI100 direct box. That track actually sounded fatter than the mic track. On the drums I used a D112 on the kick, a Beyerdynamic M-422 on the snare, three E604 and a 421 on the toms, and a C4000B on the overhead. I chose that mic for the overhead because it had a built in pad. I am not going to go into the backup vocal track; it was bad…very bad. I thought for yelling, I might be able to slip by. The lead singer used his sure wireless mic. I wanted to redo the vocals in the studio, but he wanted the live vocal feel, so I did what I could to make it work. If it wasn’t for the instrument bleed into his mic, I may have been able to do more with it. In the end, there were no overdubs. The song was recorded through a Mackie 1604 (House Mixer) and two ADATs. I transferred the tracks to the HD24 and used a PC to clean the clean them. The song was then mixed down on the MCI JH416.

-Track three was recorded by a local accomplished musician in his studio. They used ProTools to record their project. Most of the CD has that technical feel to it. I was not involved with those recordings.
 
Track #2, for exactly the reasons you stared. I like the live feel of it, that is what hit my ears.

Track #3 indeed sounds like a "professional" mixed it.
Too polished, all the air an soul sucked out of it. (Sorry Blue Bear...NOT a personal swipe at ya..)

Nice tune as well.....Stick with #2, methinks...

You didn't answer my previous question, Fishhead.
You dodged it like Janet Reno in spandex.


VI
 
Village Idiot said:
Track #2, for exactly the reasons you stared. I like the live feel of it, that is what hit my ears.

Track #3 indeed sounds like a "professional" mixed it.
Too polished, all the air an soul sucked out of it. (Sorry Blue Bear...NOT a personal swipe at ya..)

Nice tune as well.....Stick with #2, methinks...

You didn't answer my previous question, Fishhead.
You dodged it like Janet Reno in spandex.


VI
I did not mean to dodge your question. I have been busy at work and remodeling my house. I have had several recording projects in the process also. I'll try and not be gone like that again.
 
Back
Top