T
Terry Wetzel
New member
Sorry South side, I meant the one about Buddy Holly!
Capo in the 3rd fret?
You would be playing in the key of G major if the chord forms were fingered as if you were playing in E maj.
If you fingered the chords as if you were in A, with the capo in the 3rd fret, you would be playing in C.
Perhaps I don't know enough chords but, unless you had invented some exotic tuning, I don't see how you could have been in B flat?
Capo in the 3rd fret?
You would be playing in the key of G major if the chord forms were fingered as if you were playing in E maj.
If you fingered the chords as if you were in A, with the capo in the 3rd fret, you would be playing in C.
Perhaps I don't know enough chords but, unless you had invented some exotic tuning, I don't see how you could have been in B flat?
I think what he means is: He puts the Capo on the third fret, then he plays in G, which is not really playing in G. He's (in quotation marks) "Playing in G", which is usually the 3rd fret. But since he has a capo on the third fret, he's playing 3 frets up from that, which is the 6th fret. Which means he is then playing in B flat.
I hope that makes any sense at all.![]()
Ah, OK. I can't confirm the inside the body thing, I have not heard that, but I understand that Norm Petty (Holly's engineer in Texas) was one of the pioneers of the idea of close-miking of the instruments.Sorry South side, I meant the one about Buddy Holly!
Thank you RAMI ! I was starting to think I'd gotten it way off, all these years ! I possibly don't explain myself well.
I discovered multiband compression in 1995. All hardware. Of course it had been used by others before that but I didn't know. I used it in recording classical guitar to get a richer-but-not-boomy sound in the low mids while keeping the clarity of the highs, trying to maximize the crap gear I had at the time in my home studio, and it worked pretty well (the tracks got airplay on classical radio).what unusual or innovative ideas have people used on recordings or playing live ? Things that were out of the blue or totally off the wall ? Experiments that you could say you pioneered, even if it later turned out that someone had already done it?
I was the first to play my cymbals with my feet.
I've always wanted to get a right handed drummer to set up their kit left handed so that they could get those great Ringo Starr "backwards" drum fills happening. None of them will take me seriously enough to give it a shot...
You don't need to set up a kit backwards to do that.
Possible South Side but I have to doubt it. You see my brother and I recorded at Petty's studio in Clovis N.M. in 1965. Petty was producer and engineer. One of our songs was composed with acoustic guitar rythym and lead solo. Norman tried to talk me out of it. He said acoustic guitars lacked sufficient energy to record at a good level. I insisted and he relented. He later overdubbed a vibraphone played by his wife which all but obliterated my solo! One can take this 2 ways. First, he had used the mic inside the guitar idea and it worked well enough for Buddy Holly, wouldn't he have done it again? Second, as I said earlier, Buddy was a perfectionist and if he had tried the mic inside idea and it pleased him, I guess it's possible but, I still doubt it. Anyway, once again, my response to this was originally meant for the guy who put the first comment on this in the forum but thanks for your input.Ah, OK. I can't confirm the inside the body thing, I have not heard that, but I understand that Norm Petty (Holly's engineer in Texas) was one of the pioneers of the idea of close-miking of the instruments.
I can see it now:
BUDDY HOLLY: "Hey, Norm you get that mic any closer to the guitar and it'll be inside the doggone thing!
NORM PETTY: Hmmmmm!!!
G.
I know, Terry. It was a joke, son! (hence the smiley facePossible South Side but I have to doubt it.
Hey Mr. Clean.
I'd like to know the source of this little rock trivia statement!
thanks.