I'm sorry, but honestly, what is so "meek-looking" about the Edward? The typical look (what I think the lawyers are calling "dress rights") is that they are green, have a dead ugly joemeek logo that looks like something a kid created with rub-on lettering, and are just in general look "homemade".
The joemeek look is "We don't put any money on looks, only on sound, and we are green".
The Edward is not green. The TFPro logo looks like something an artdirector has come up with. The same goes for that P8 mark on the right, which fits with the TFPro website, and obviously is the idea of somebody that are in charge of designing the stuff. The Edward does NOT look like "we don't care about how the boxes look". I can not in my wildest imagination see how anybody, from looks alone, could think that the Edward is made by PMI Audio. The only similarities are in fact that the VU meters are square, and the buttons are the same. Don't tell me that it's just because of the buttons, because I don't believe it.
By the way, from the looks of the new designs on PMI Audios homepages, they are TOO dropping that "We don't care about looks"-look, including getting all new, cool round VU meters (I do think the new designs look awesome, this is not a critisism, I'm just noting that it's changing). So PMI audio are not going to keep that part of the joemeek "trade dress", either, so why fight about it? It's just silly.
Old joemeek boxes are butt ugly. The new ones aren't, and neither are TFPros. The confusion on the market are created solely by TFPro first making green boxes, and their distributors now selling TFPro stuff under the joemeek trademark, which they shouldn't.
Ozraves have done none of this and should therefore not get any stupid letters from lawyers trying to sue him.
