T
themaddog
Rockin' & Rollin'
OK, for anyone that was watching an earlier post about the MSR-16 and tape to use for it, I finally did my test between Quantegy 456 tape and Texas Tape Work's special run of LPR 35. My band recorded the same song on both reels of tape, with the same levels. We did them all at high and low speed.
The best sound overall was always off of the high speed. I didn't know if the bass response would be better with the low speed, but it sounded even tighter and fuller at high speed. As for which tape sounds best...
It's really a question of not what sounds better, but there is a difference is sound. The 456 has a lot of that analog warmth people are always talking about. It's good, but not necessarily good for what we play. I would use it and shell out the extra money, maybe, if I were recording a blues band or olde time rock 'n' roll. The LPR 35 came out sounding more accurate to me and another guy in my band.
I had the DBX on for all tests. I tried snare drum hits at different levels to try and hear which could handle higher levels. I did not exceed +8, since that is where the meters stop on the MSR-16, and I figured any higher would confuse the DBX. Both sounded similar in how they handled the higher levels, except for the aforementioned "warmth" difference.
Either tape sounds great, but I can buy almost three reels of LPR35, with that much more tape on it (1 mil reels as a pose to 1.5 mil 456), for the cost of one reel of Quantegy 456. I didn't hear any problems with print through or anything like that, although I would imagine that would take its toll over time. Perhaps 456 would hold up better over time, but who knows, since BASF 468 is reputed to hold up so well.
I have a reel of Quantegy 406. Someday I'll try that one out too and hear if there's a difference. Any ideas from anyone about using 406 on the MSR-16?
Thanks, and I hope this post helps out anybody who was thinking about using LPR-35, particuarly all you guys who have been helping me out so much!
-MD
The best sound overall was always off of the high speed. I didn't know if the bass response would be better with the low speed, but it sounded even tighter and fuller at high speed. As for which tape sounds best...
It's really a question of not what sounds better, but there is a difference is sound. The 456 has a lot of that analog warmth people are always talking about. It's good, but not necessarily good for what we play. I would use it and shell out the extra money, maybe, if I were recording a blues band or olde time rock 'n' roll. The LPR 35 came out sounding more accurate to me and another guy in my band.
I had the DBX on for all tests. I tried snare drum hits at different levels to try and hear which could handle higher levels. I did not exceed +8, since that is where the meters stop on the MSR-16, and I figured any higher would confuse the DBX. Both sounded similar in how they handled the higher levels, except for the aforementioned "warmth" difference.
Either tape sounds great, but I can buy almost three reels of LPR35, with that much more tape on it (1 mil reels as a pose to 1.5 mil 456), for the cost of one reel of Quantegy 456. I didn't hear any problems with print through or anything like that, although I would imagine that would take its toll over time. Perhaps 456 would hold up better over time, but who knows, since BASF 468 is reputed to hold up so well.
I have a reel of Quantegy 406. Someday I'll try that one out too and hear if there's a difference. Any ideas from anyone about using 406 on the MSR-16?
Thanks, and I hope this post helps out anybody who was thinking about using LPR-35, particuarly all you guys who have been helping me out so much!
-MD
Last edited: