Stuck. I don't know how to record...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr. Varney
  • Start date Start date
Asio means "Audio Stream Input/Output" dont worry about the technical aspects..its just a driver protocol...tick the boxes ;)

this will direct your program to your soundcard

S/PDIF is a digital audio format, its used for transporting stereo signals on PC sound cards cards and will be a connector "hole" on your soundcard..


once you ticked them click the "General" tab in audio options and make sure that E-MU ASIO PCI is the input under "Playback timing master" and output under "Record timing master"


then the software should be ready for your musical input
 
Are you managing to get any sound out of Sonar?

I have had sound out of Sonar in the past, yes. Again, depending on the state of the onboard virtual DSP.

Have you disabled your PCs original soundcard?

Yes.

(More importantly) What are you using to amplify your guitar?

The Behringer rackmount mixer has an onboard pre-amp, which I assume is enough for any DAW, since my power amp offers more than reasonable output to the monitors. In practice, I use the gain knob and output slider of the appropriate strip, to pipe it to the main mix.
 
So I've opened Tutorial 1. There is no sound. How do I get sound?

Sonar Help said:
In the Track view, click the Output dropdown menu in a track.

Where is the "output dropdown menu"?

Christ, I have NEVER come across software where the help is THIS hard to follow. Tells me to do things, but doesn't tell me where they are or how to find them!

I hate this... I HATE IT! What kind of recording device can I get for around £80 quid? I've had enough.

Alright... Count to ten... Look on YouTube... There has to be a better way... I can't read that help file, it's useless.

Oh great! I found this! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNy9ybt2xs0&feature=player_embedded# Perfect! Just perfect!
 
Last edited:
Okay, I got this far...

http://www.cakewalk.com/tips/PatchMixDSP/

(Cakewalk kindly do a tutorial to help users of various soundcards, set up their equipment).

So here I am and this is what I'm seeing...

Cakewalk Tuturial said:
This will bring you to the 'New Mixer Strip' dialog. Check the box for 'PhysicalSource' and choose one of the stereo input pairs. In this example we are using the Mic Inputs A and B on the front of the 1820m dock. You can choose any input you'd like to use. But to simplify things in SONAR Â it's best to only choose stereo inputs.

PatchMixDSP_image012.jpg


And this is a shot from my own screen...

DSP_NewMixerStrip-dialogue.gif


The list looks nothing like what they have and I don't know what this "1820m Dock" is all about but I have three choices. Which one should I choose?

Okay, so I have the definintions for ASIO and S/PDIF but in the real world, these things do not mean much to me. Can anyone explain, precisely how the terms Audio Stream Input Output and Sony-Philips Digital Interface Format relate to what I am trying to achieve here? When I should select them, in what oil to cook them and whether or not to salt them?

Thanks.
 
Well, I just skimmed through most of the posts here and, honestly, you need to take a few steps back and start at the very beginning... and that means reading. You asked some very basic questions like,
"What do you mean by 'the board'?"
and made a statement like,
"An ordinary hand-held mic (on a stand). Not a phantom power one. Don't know how else to describe it"
or
"I don't know even the most basic things"
and, seriously, you've got to learn the basics before you can expect to achieve anything.

You made a very accurate observation with learning layers in Photoshop, the same applies here. You can't just walk into recording and expect to go from ab initio to expert in one sitting.

Granted, You're using the EMU 0404 and Patchmix software and I know it is not the easiest or most intuitve to learn. I started out with the same thing and gave up on it and got something else. I think you should get some books and start reading. Read read read. Here's a good site to go to also:

http://www.tweakheadz.com/guide.htm

I recommend Homerecording for Musicians for Dummies by Jeff Strong. Don't let the title dissuade you, it's a well written book for people like you and me just starting out.

Not trying to be rude, just want to help get your expectations where they should be.
 
Not only would a cheap stand alone recorder be less frustrating to you right now but would be a marvelous training tool.
P.M. me if you want and I'll give you some tips on what to look for.
This is supposed to be fun but it's no fun at all when nothing goes right.

Here's one
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ZOOM-MRS-4-MU...ters?hash=item3ca66ff5a1&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14
I'll find some more.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Boss-BR-8-Dig...ters?hash=item27ac0ffbbe&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ZOOM-MRS8-MUL...ters?hash=item1c0d1767e3&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/BOSS-BR-532-4...ters?hash=item3ca659ec6c&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Zoom-MRS-1266...ters?hash=item3a539c51ec&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14
There you go.
 
Last edited:
Not only would a cheap stand alone recorder be less frustrating to you right now but would be a marvelous training tool.
P.M. me if you want and I'll give you some tips on what to look for.
This is supposed to be fun but it's no fun at all when nothing goes right.

.

Super point too...Ive seen some of the newer Tascam 8 trackers going for less than alot of software options (About $200)...and those are the ones that can be used to dump tracks right into some of that software...they have reasonably clean pres and 8 inputs.

While crashing and compatability is a common problem with computer software...it isnt a problem with these units...the OS on a computer isnt designed to be a recording studio.

Because of the software options the prices have gone way down on these units...and resale isnt so good...but when you are buying, that is a good thing now isnt it.
 
Jim and Darrin are heading down the path I'd recommend.

Go get a used cassette multitrack recorder. They're going for pennies on the dollar these days. With that, you've got a button, knob and fader for every single function that the machine possesses. When you become conversant with the layout and signal flow logic of a cassette multitrack recorder, you'll be pleasantly surprised how much of that transfers to a decent DAW.

The Tascam 488 mkII is a great little recorder and a wonderful learning tool.
Start there and figure it out. Then, make the move to DAW-land.
Best of luck. Stick with it.:cool:
 
Jim and Darrin are heading down the path I'd recommend.

Go get a used cassette multitrack recorder. They're going for pennies on the dollar these days. With that, you've got a button, knob and fader for every single function that the machine possesses. When you become conversant with the layout and signal flow logic of a cassette multitrack recorder, you'll be pleasantly surprised how much of that transfers to a decent DAW.

The Tascam 488 mkII is a great little recorder and a wonderful learning tool.
Start there and figure it out. Then, make the move to DAW-land.
Best of luck. Stick with it.:cool:

Where would he buy cassette tapes nowdays?...do they still make those?...id avoid the MD ones alltogether.

The stand-alone units are all over craigslist for super cheap from cassette to the HD units...ive seen old Cassette ones for $25 to $100 for a HD one with a CD burner....alot of kids get them and never use them.
 
the OS on a computer isn't designed to be a recording studio.
Took me two and a half years to come to that conclusion.
Went out and bought myself a Korg.
The links I gave him were all cheap, Boss/Fostex rigs on E-Bay.... U.K. and around his price range.
 
Yo Doc! I feel your pain. There's a bit of a learning curve with a standalone digital recorder also, and they can be annoying and counterintuitive in their own way, too. Now, I'm going to do something different, because it's what I *can* do, and because you are polite, and I know you're trying to be calm. I won't try to talk you through the computer stuff, because there are already better geeks than me working on it. I'd like to look more at the front end, because if you are not putting out a signal that the sound card can recognize, tweaking software won't help you. First, that's a handheld "dynamic" mic, and for our present purposes, we don't need to know what make or model, only that it works, and that the cable (wire) is good. You are apparently plugging a guitar in by DI (direct insertion), rather than mic'ing the guitar.

We don't know if it's an electric guitar or an acoustic with a pickup, but that doesn't really matter, either, as long as it is working. I've seen someone go through what you are, and find out after 2 weeks of downloading patches, etc., that the active pickup in his acoustic had a dead battery! Next, the mic needs to be plugged into a mic input, which is usally a 3-pin XLR connector, the female version of the one on the mic. The guitar needs to be plugged into an instrument input, generally known as a high impedence, or "high-z" jack. You should be able to hear the guitar and vocal on the headphone jack of the mixer (that's quaintly called a "mixing desk" by our esteemed brothers and sisters in Australia and the UK.)

OK- if you are hearing everything in the headphones OK, then patch the left and right line outs (which are your main outs on an unpowered mixer, and the tape outs of a powered mixer) to the line level input of the sound card. *Then* let the geeks tell you how to get the software to recognize the external hardware and twiddle all those virtual knobs.

The best advice I can give you is to think about the signal chain from the beginning, not from the end. If you have a really good song, with a great performance, on a great instrument, in a good room, with the right mic (not the most expensive mic), in the right place, plugged into a really good mic preamp, you can plug it into one of those cheap cassette 4-trackers they are talking about, and go collect your "best new artist" Grammy. On the other hand, a bad song, badly played,on a cheap instrument, in a sucky room, into the wrong mic and a sleazy preamp, cannot be fixed by anyone short of God, with the most advanced digital processing studios in the world. My God, man- you are killing yourself trying to hook up a DAW so it works, and you don't even know what mic you are using! This DAW business is giving you cart-before-horse syndrome.
All I'm saying is- before you kill yourself because you have no garbage out, make sure there's some garbage in. Best of luck. Have faith. These guys are trying to help, and the connections will ultimately be sorted out.-Richie
 
Last edited:
This has to be the best forum I've attended. The advice slams me straight in the redundant common sense node and sparks it back into life. I realise I must have been starting somewhere in the middle and trying to work outwards in two directions, instead of at the start.

I will buy Sound Recording For Dummies. Dummy stage is where I'm at, so not put of by the title in the least.

I will start looking at 4-trackers/SD card recorders and I will keep reading up on the software.

Might I just add, as well as saying I'm encouraged by the abundance of options to investigate, that you have been the most helpful and pleasant bunch of chaps ever to talk down to me :D. Hah! No, I mean it - Everyone's been very patient with me and yet the advice is strong and valuable and made me feel even more determined to crack this nut. I very much appreciate it, guys!

Thankyou!

I'll be back later when I've had another read of Tweakheads guide - and re-read some of the other replies.

Dr. V
 
Last edited:
Yo Doc! I feel your pain. There's a bit of a learning curve with a standalone digital recorder also, and they can be annoying and counterintuitive in their own way, too.

I have heard this, too. I read on another forum, about a user for whom it took him a week to get his Yamaha AW-series station to record anything; subsequently ended up burning a bag load of files to a disc which he didn't need again (long story). Fortunately for any user with an optical connection -->IN to his soundcard, I believe this particular unit will throw work-in-progress staight into a DAW sequencer, ready for editing and saving; which sounds about right for my purposes.

First, that's a handheld "dynamic" mic, and for our present purposes, we don't need to know what make or model, only that it works, and that the cable (wire) is good. You are apparently plugging a guitar in by DI (direct insertion), rather than mic'ing the guitar.

Yeah, sorry. I should have mentioned 'electric' in the guitar line. My reasoning for listing make and model were for on the offchance someone was familiar with potential quirks of said units. Happily proved, as it illicited the following response:

if your having trouble with the behringer mixer and the emu sound card send me an IM and ill help you out cause im using a behringer mixer almost like yours and i have the emu1212m which uses the DSP software just like the 0404.

KingOfPain - I really would like to know from you, exactly how you have your chain set up, between mixer and soundcard. I suspect this would be a worthy step in the right direction for me.

Next, the mic needs to be plugged into a mic input, which is usally a 3-pin XLR connector, the female version of the one on the mic.

My God, man- you are killing yourself trying to hook up a DAW so it works, and you don't even know what mic you are using! This DAW business is giving you cart-before-horse syndrome.

Ah! Got to stop you there... You are right, I know you're right, so I'm not going to act defencive but to re-itterate, the mic is not of what you'd call pro-variety. It's extremely cheap and basic. I don't know what you call these, but it's not a professional mic, bearing the standard XLR plug; rather a 1.5 jack (which I simply adapt up to the larger socket, required for the mixer.)

What's important about this mic
, is that I have made acceptable results by connecting it my old laptop (for which I purchased a sound module, bearing mic and Line-in sockets) and using Audacity. Although the quality was not brilliant, I feel that if I can get a signal in off it, then I know signal is reaching the DAW. Upgrading the mic to something more respectable is then just a case of £££s. First, I just want to know something (anything) will work. If Audacity is a free, non-professional program and this mic worked there, then (by my humble reckoning) a professional quality application like Cubase or Sonar should be able to recieve it.

The guitar needs to be plugged into an instrument input, generally known as a high impedence, or "high-z" jack. You should be able to hear the guitar and vocal on the headphone jack of the mixer (that's quaintly called a "mixing desk" by our esteemed brothers and sisters in Australia and the UK.)

Okay... I've heard of High-Z, from when I was shopping around for my soundcard. There's an M-Audio interface I nearly bought, which features Hi-Z line input. Now, knowing a guitar must be pre-amped before entering the computer, I have it plugged into the mixer (which I understand features a pre-amp ((hence reason for listing model and make - 1204fx-pro with Phantom Power)))? In fact, for jamming and messing about, I find there is plenty of gain to put it through into the domestic amp on which I am monitoring - (as an aside:- I have in the past, taken a line from something called "Stereo Aux Return" and fed that into the main input of my Marshal practice amp. The result being the FX affected signal reached my monitors, while the dry signal came out of the Marshal. By raising the gain on the Marshall, I was able to get a nice distorted 'underneath' sound, which beefed up the whole performance). Anyway, was hoping the mixer would handle the job of pre-amping the guitar/mics/whatever, adequately, before reaching the computer. Am I right? Or am I needing a different kind of powered input, (such as High-Z) before I send it to the computer? Note: When I have (by absolute chance) managed to get Cubase to record the guitar, the result was by far too low to be useful (and I had all Cubase's levels set as high as I dared). This was not the case for Audacity, in which the guitar was SO LOUD it distorted beyond what I could cope with.

The best advice I can give you is to think about the signal chain from the beginning, not from the end. If you have a really good song, with a great performance, on a great instrument, in a good room, with the right mic (not the most expensive mic), in the right place, plugged into a really good mic preamp, you can plug it into one of those cheap cassette 4-trackers they are talking about, and go collect your "best new artist" Grammy.

I'm reading you loud and clear. Prompts a question... Those "cheap cassette 4-trackers (they are talking about)"... I want to know - do they utilize a standard cassette or a specialised, 4-track version? If the former, then I have reams of tape, lying around which could be used. This option could possibly save me £££'s. I'm willing to try it.

Only problem I can foresee is that I am still at square one because it doesn't matter what I'm trying to record FROM (if you see what I mean...) ie: If the mic and guitar are not getting into the DAW, through DSP Patchmix (via mixer), then neither will the signal from a tape machine.

So, first things first - I need to understand that DSP application. In fact, thinking about this - were I to conquer JUST THAT, I strongly suspect I'd be in a position to move forward... Possibly negating the need for a tape recorder in the first place! So - my first goal: Get a signal, any signal, running through Patchmix, into the DAW; any DAW. In the event of success, might relegate a sophisticated standalone recording station to a mere luxury (useful for recording in the field, etc).

I'm not sure... Please correct me if I am wrong in anything I've said.

Best of luck. Have faith. These guys are trying to help, and the connections will ultimately be sorted out.-Richie

That's right - and thank you!

Cheers.

Dr. V
 
Last edited:
Depends on the model but many of the Tascams use a simple cassette tape. If they don't, you'll see it plainly on the specs.
They work by splitting the tape into 4 tracks and running slower.
Magnificent way to learn the art of recording and bouncing tracks.
Like many of the folks around here, I had one years ago.
So here's my final suggestion to you.
Spend no money.
Download "Mixcraft" free trial.
Plug your microphone directly into your PC "Mic. In".
and TINKER!
You'll have the hang of it in a month by which time you will know whether or not you want to continue and will have reached your own conclusion as to what equipment you would like to use.
Have Fun! ;):)
 
Thanks, Jimlad... That sounds like a plan.

Is 'Mixcraft' going to work as a replacement for DSP Patchmix, for the E=MU 0404?

V
 
At least you found this board early on. I've been recording for over ten years and would have learned a lot of things way sooner if I'd looked for resources like this.

Having someone come check out your setup is a great idea. Anyone with ANY experience will probably be more helpful than reading a bunch of books. Not that books aren't useful, but knowing what things mean and using them are different things.

Unless you really intend to pursue this stuff as a profession, I'd say it's not so important to learn everything about it - just what you need to know. Not that you should cut corners, but I guess what I mean is you can drive a car without knowing every detail about how it works. Start with the basics and don't pressure yourself by trying to learn too much at once.
 
are you still having trouble with the DSP software?
i think i could help guide you through it, i have the E-MU 1212m which uses the same software.
 
Thanks, Jimlad... That sounds like a plan.

Is 'Mixcraft' going to work as a replacement for DSP Patchmix, for the E=MU 0404?

V

As another alternative to Mixcraft, Reaper has a 30 free trial, and even once the trial period is up, you just get a "nag screen message"- the software still works. http://www.reaper.fm/

I've tried several of the "cheap" standalone recorders, and I hated all of them- I'd much rather be working on a computer, and to contradict some of the earlier comments, I dont think I've ever had a problem with OS or compatibility or crashes. But, to qualify my statements, my career involves daily use of a computer, so I've become fairly proficient for other reasons.

To say that an "OS isn't designed to be a recording studio" or that crashes and compatibility issues are the norm is downright false in my experience.


I'd definately try to get rolling with the stuff you already have- no need to spend any money yet. Get your stuff working, realize where you need to improve and spend money from there.

Stick around Doc, you'll get all the help you need... :)
 
Thanks, Jimlad... That sounds like a plan.

Is 'Mixcraft' going to work as a replacement for DSP Patchmix, for the E=MU 0404?

V

Unfortunately, you still need Patchmix to route your signals to the ASIO channels, but there should be a preset already set up for you. It should look like something below.

Insert a Send (Output to Asio/Wave or Physical Out) by right clicking on an empty slot. Where do you have your inputs?? Probably the PCI L and R. You can see where I have an Insert a Send for the SPDIF channel (yellow box) and it's going to ASIO 9/10 (in the little TV screen-thingy). You don't have to worry about SPDIF, from your previous posts, I don't think you're using it.

When you insert a Send, you have to choose which ASIO channel to send it to, pick the lowest number available. Then in your DAW, look for that same ASIO number when you assign an input to a track.
 

Attachments

  • EMUPatchMix.webp
    EMUPatchMix.webp
    45.5 KB · Views: 52
Back
Top