mentil69 said:
thanx harvey youre the answer i was looking for. I also have a question about mic quality. Im getting more knowledgable in terms of microphones and there different applications, but i was wondering if this statement is true; The better quality of the mic, the more the vocals stick out in the mix.
No, that statement is NOT true. It depends on a number of other factors, like the arrangement, the panning of all the instruments, and the type of song, to name just a few items.
The microphone is usually chosen for a particular singer based on either complimenting that particular singer's voice, or creating a unusually distinctive sound for a particular song.
Depending on the singer (and the song), I may choose a large diaphragm condenser mic , a ribbon mic, or a dynamic mic, or even a very cheap mic run into a distortion box (to get a slightly gritty sound).
There are no hard and fast rules about mic choices for vocalists; it depends on the particular singer, and the particular mic.
I'm not sure if this is an urban legend or not, but it's worth repeating here:
After Carly Simon completed a recent album, it was decided that she would do a live performance of the album at Grand Central Station in New York. During the performance, the producer and Carly both were impressed with the sound of
the Shure Beta 58 on her voice for one particular song.
They were so impressed (so the story goes), that they went back into the studio to recut the track with that mic, and eliminated the track cut with an expensive old Neumann.
While that story may or may not be true, it's a great example of actual situations where a mic that you wouldn't dream of using normally for something, turns out to be the best choice for that one particular task.