SM57 as good as an Oktava condenser???

  • Thread starter Thread starter endserenading81
  • Start date Start date
E

endserenading81

New member
I was recording some vocals today with 2 mics paired together. The Shure SM57 and the Oktava MK-012. Not to alarm anyone, but there wasn't much difference in clarity. Aren't these condensers supposed to be better than any dynamic mic. Maybe I should do another test with cymbals, since the Oktavas are often used as overhead mics.
Oh well!
Take care everyone,
Rob
 
endserenading81 said:
Aren't these condensers supposed to be better than any dynamic mic.

The SM57 is a dynamic mic, and the MC012 is a condenser mic.
 
The Oktava, like any condenser, will have faster transient response.
Therefore, it will tend to give a more accurate (not necessarily better!)
representation of the sound source.

The Oktava, assuming it's a "good" one, is generally a fine vocal microphone.
More prone to popping than a SM57, however, and is more sensitive to
the ambient sound of the room where the recording is taking place.
It has less coloration than the SM57, so it tends to be well suited for classical and choral applications.

The SM57 has been used on many hit lead vocals that have sold zillions of copies. Ribbons microphones like the RCA 77 or 44, are technically dynamic mirophones also, and are generally considered among the finest mics in the world for general useage.

Chris
 
endserenading81 said:
I was recording some vocals today with 2 mics paired together. The Shure SM57 and the Oktava MK-012. Not to alarm anyone, but there wasn't much difference in clarity. Aren't these condensers supposed to be better than any dynamic mic. Maybe I should do another test with cymbals, since the Oktavas are often used as overhead mics.
Oh well!
Take care everyone,
Rob
"better" is not a good word to compare condensers and dynamics. dynamic and condensers are very subjunctive and have different uses. for vocals....i wouldn't be using small diaphram condensers. the 57 is sometimes a choice for vocals. other wise i'd find a large diaphram condenser. throw that 57 on guitar or snare....heh
 
Condenser and dynamic mics are two different beast... you can't compare the two. Period.
 
I don't like the MK012 on individual "intimate" vocals at all. It's just to clinical. Back it up and record a group and it works fine. IMO

OTOH, the 57 works very well for intimate recording if you like the color it has. For some voices it is very nice.

My favorite mic, on my voice, of the ones I own is the NTK, a large diaphram tube condensor.

Blessings, Terry
 
The Oktava, assuming it's a "good" one, is generally a fine vocal microphone.

In my meager collection of mics, the Oktava MK012 happens to sound best on my voice. 10" back, forehead level pointing down, and a pop filter and I'm good to go.
 
Back
Top