Recording 'real' music

  • Thread starter Thread starter popstar
  • Start date Start date
Hey WideAwake, I should have been more specific when responding to SoundCrack's statment and edited my post to say "True point" and not "Excellent points" when SC stated that "their hasn't been a module produced that can capture all the nuances of real instrument".DUHHH!! I'm pretty much sure any-1 with artifical intelligence can make that same statement. That was the only thing I happen to agree with him on.Other than that,his post just rambled on about his experience,his clients etc, etc.
Yo wideawake, trust me! I KNOW a sample when I hear one!
Modules and the like are here for all of us to produce
REAL MUSIC! I'll try not to make anymore disturbing statments either! :)
Peace
Mr.Q
 
I have way too much experience in audio to ever have to "reconsider" anything I have to say about it.

If you are into quality, then....
patience is a virtue!

Soon enough.

Good day!
Click to expand...


Soundcraker We all have the patience and can't wait to hear your vast experience and quality recordings.
Just don't keep us waiting to long......

Welcome popstar I'm sure every body understands now that you had no intention in being arrogant as to Real V.S. synth music.
It might be an interesting topic to debate. If we all leave the cruddy remarks at home.
 
Just how equip-ignorant am I?...

What's a POD?

...stop laughing, I'm serious...
 
Shailat said:
I have way too much experience in audio to ever have to "reconsider" anything I have to say about it.

If you are into quality, then....
patience is a virtue!

Soon enough.

Good day!
Click to expand...


Soundcraker We all have the patience and can't wait to hear your vast experience and quality recordings.
Just don't keep us waiting to long......

Welcome popstar I'm sure every body understands now that you had no intention in being arrogant as to Real V.S. synth music.
It might be an interesting topic to debate. If we all leave the cruddy remarks at home.
Click to expand...

c'mon soundcracker, dont you have anything in your years of experience to point us to? I want to hear something you've worked on. Dont get me wrong here, I was just telling my friend about how every single one of your posts have been helpful..but your just dangling a carrot in front of a rabbit in a cage. You definitely know what your talking about, so I wanna hear some stuff.
 
hhhmmm

Hey soundcracker...you mean to tell us that with over 20 years experience recording "real" instruments, etc., you don't have anything right now to show for it?? Of all the bands you recorded, they all have restrictions on listening to their stuff (like none of them are poor bastards and have a MP3.com site like every other poor bastard here)? Or..you don't even have something you've done? You're making us wait....jeez...the agony. Personally, I wouldn't mind that with an arrogant attitude you seem to display if you where disgruntled and took a hike away from these boards.
 
popstar said:
Hi. I havent seen many posts on recording 'real' music, acoustic drums, guitars etc so I thought it was time to discuss some new techniques.
Click to expand...

C'mon cut the guy some slack, I really think he was just asking about techniques for recording 'real' or live instuments, not making a judgement about electronic music.
 
hello.

alright no more newbie bashing.

There are A LOT of real instruments played on this BBS. and a lot of mp3s in the mp3 mixing forum. go check them out.
 
vox, who's in disagreement about "REAL" instruments? Popstars only error was when he said "REAL" music! There is no need to cut anyone any slack when that terminology is used!
ALL music is REAL music.
Nuff said!
Peace
Mr.Q
 
damn..cut the dude some slack (sound cracker)..I just wanna hear some music that this guy has worked on..call off the dogs.

popstar: are your links working yet? I'm curious.
 
damn..cut the dude some slack (sound cracker)..I just wanna hear some music that this guy has worked on..call off the dogs.
Click to expand...


Ametth,

I treat all members new and old with the outmost respect.
Knowledgeable or not has no meaning to me. In my book they are all great guys.

However perhaps it would be wiser for Soundcracker, to crub his arogance.
He might be an excellet engineer/musician and he might be a fraud, but arogance doesn't sound good on anybody.

Having worked in the audio buisness for quite a few years,
I can tell you that the real good engineers have nothing to prove and so they never talk about themselfs.

His posting music means nothing to me as well. I coudn't care less if it's great or not or if it's really his or not.
If he has good advice then great. Let us all benefit from it and let him save his self back patting for his clients.
 
ok, this shoudl be in the mp3 mixing forum, however ill comment here.

'I should be' - it sounds pretty clear, and i know that the deficiency i hear in the cymbals is probbaly because of the mp3 formattting, but i can kinda hear a canned overhead sound. might be the mp3. also, its encoding is SO jumpy it doesnt go 5 seconds without jumping so its impossible to listen to.
 
I like you popstar,but for some reason I still could not
access your link!
 
Hey, that wasn't a "real" reverb Popstar,LOL. Sounded like an artificial one to me. The MP3 was jumpy but I appreciate it anyway.
 
jumpiness

yeah I noticed the jumpiness as well, this is the first MP3 that we've tried putting on the web and to be honest we are pretty clueless. Any tips?
 
I do have one tip: you should present yourself better. The mp3 was awful.

what mp3 program did you use? let's start there.
 
okay, point taken. The CD sounds great normally (honest!), I used musicmatch jukebox to convert it to Mp3.
 
Now since I threw the first punch, maybe I should explain myself....I was not taking a crack at the real vs. synthsized issue, I was not taking issue with the quality of Popstars playing, quality of Mp3, etc...I was just kinda pissed that someone would come in on their first post I believe it was and knock the BBS...I heard many MP3's of "real music" and the forums are loaded with posts about recording "real music"...my post was just telling him to take his head out of his ass and look around for it...if I came off wrong or or seemed like an asshole as Vurt so kindly put it then oh well...I will not apologize for what I said...Im sorry if he took it the wrong way...But let me ask of you who is the asshole...the guy who comes in on his first post and bashes the BBS, or the guy who steps up and defends it....
 
HEY! now listen, I AM NOT knocking the bbs, jus coz it was my first post doesn't mean that I didn't look around it first..I don't think anyone is knocking your defence of it, rather the manner in which it was done. what was it? oh yes, you can help me differentiate my "ass" and a hole in the ground. Well cheers for that nugget of information. Now........peace...
 
BTW Popstar,

You may want to do a search of the BBS to find yourself a better MP3 encoder for your "real music"....It may have sounded half decent...One hint and this isnt a cheap shot...if your bass player sucks, dont let him solo...unless he's rich and owns the P.A. system in which case youre screwed....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top