reccommend me some directx mastering plugins

  • Thread starter Thread starter treymonfauntre
  • Start date Start date
treymonfauntre

treymonfauntre

Magic Bag Of Sounds
its obviously not going to be a pro result so i'm not gonna pretend thats what i want. i just want some (trials) to play around with on this mix to see if i can get a result i like. i've got a mix that sounds like it could use a decent deal of clarity and some of the lowend needs to be tightened up. i've done some work with eq but it just seem like something is missing that i can't figure out using basic plugins. i used the izotope ozone trial and it gave me pretty good results, but now the trials over and i'd like to try out some other plugins before i came upon a decision.
any suggestions on trials i can try out?
 
I like Ozone for Mastering. I don't use all of its modules though. I tend to use the exciter and the stereo enhancer while I let my LA2A plugin handle the limiting.
 
Ozone's good. I liked some particular things about it - the EQ's digital filters, the limiter with quick release. Didn't like the sound of the multiband filters, thought the digital filters were better than the other. Beyond that the mb compressor worked well. Didn't care for the sound of the exciter, reverb or stereo widening sections. The spectrum viewing graph is really good.

The Waves Masters Bundle is a little more than twice the cost of Ozone, but it's about 10 times better, so worth the $ to me. Gotta try the demo even just to know what the high end plugs sound like compared to the lower.

The Dave Brown DX plugs are good and pretty cheap. The multiband limiter is the best of the bunch IMO. The filters sound good and the graphics show really well what's happening with levels and gain reduction in each band. The mastering limiter didn't sound good to me. The broadband comp is pretty good sounding if you don't use the brickwall limiter that's tacked onto it. The whole set is worth buying just to get the mb limiter.

If you can use a DX wrapper for VST plugs, the multiband compressor by slim slow slider is good, and freeware. An amazing plug that sounds really good if you use its digital filters. And the Blockfish freeware limiter sounds more transparent than most other limiter I've used except the Waves L2.

Tim
 
If you're looking for clarity and low end tightness, I think the place to fix that is in the tracking and in the mix, rather than with mastering.
 
First, I'm with mattamatta... If you have access to the mix, fix it there. This is one of several reasons that mastering your own recordings is somewhat self-defeating** (but that's for another thread).

Other than that, I'm a former Waves / current UAD fan. IMO, their EQ's and to a lesser extent compression*, are the ones to beat.


*I still think their compressors are the bomb as far as plugins go - I'm just not a plugin guy when it comes to compression at the mastering stage.

**Spelling error noted. Thanks! :eek:
 
Last edited:
treymonfauntre, have you read the Ozone mastering guide pdf? Excellent info there on processing in general.

Tim
 
I like the WaveHammer found in SoundForge. Nice. smooth. clean compression and volume maximizer.


Also.. (and I know I'll probably catch hell for this one), BBE Sonic Maximizer DX plugin, used judiciously, can really add substance and shine to a mix.
 
michaelst said:
Also.. (and I know I'll probably catch hell for this one), BBE Sonic Maximizer DX plugin, used judiciously, can really add substance and shine to a mix.
Click to expand...
big fuckin' yikes.................................... :eek:
 
That's funny, Bruce - I was going to say the same thing about WaveHammer... :D
 
Wave Hammer is awful. Like an awful, anal excuse for a VCA-based compressor.
 
Wavehammer is great as long as you have never heard a real mastering compressor/limiter. a lot of this stuff sounds great if you don't know the difference.
 
Farview said:
... a lot of this stuff sounds great if you don't know the difference.
Click to expand...

Should read: a lot of this stuff sounds great if you are deaf and have no idea what musicality is. :D

Farview, check your rep for details. :D
 
Perspective

I think Farview and others make an outstanding point for all to consider.

The experience levels, training, equipment, physical plant and time to dedicate to recording/mixing/mastering of forum members is incredibly diverse therfore perspectives are diverse as well.

I'd guess Farview is correct in that most folks on this forum really don't know what a great mastering compressor/limiter sounds like compared to pickafreeware soft plugin.....I'm sure I don't.

Only recently did I purchase an RNC compressor....by no means a high end piece of outboard gear, but a nice box and seemingly great value nonetheless. To my ears.....it absolutely kills the plugins included with Adobe Audition. I'm sure that a real pro quality high end compressor would kill the RNC. Again, my perspective/reference point is limited to MY own limited experience.

You can't expect a Hobbyist to be as savvy as true professionals in the same discipline? Not an indictment of anyone....just is what it is.

Bart
 
  • Like
Reactions: XLR
Bartman said:
You can't expect a Hobbyist to be as savvy as true professionals in the same discipline? Not an indictment of anyone....just is what it is.

Bart
Click to expand...
And you cannot expect to get the same results as the pros do without the experience and gear, etc... It doesn't make anything better or worse, good or bad. But it doesn't do anyone any good when you bullshit yourself into thinking that a freeware plugin is doing the exact same thing that a $9000 compressor is. Or that your behringer truth monitors are just as good as a set of Genelecs for tracking and magicly turn into mastering monitor that are just as good as B&Ws. It is possible to get great results on not so great gear, but it takes more skill, patience, luck, etc... than on great equipment.
 
Well said Bartman.

I think that we learn a lot and gain listening perspective by tinkering with a gamut of bad, mediocre and good processing - and that the categories are subjective based on sophistication and application.

Tim
 
Hmmm... I guess all the 'professionals' here on the HOME recording.com bbs are correct.

Trey...

You must buy $20k worth of software(to start) to come anywhere close to having anything sound descent. You must also buy about $100k worth of hardware(monitors, mixers, outboards). You have to sonically treat your listening room with basstraps, difussers and absorbers.

You cannot trust the people at BBE, or Sony(SonicFoundry) to produce any kind of software that would give you a result that could possible compare to what the 'professionals' on the HOME recording.com BBS can do. Anything except what the 'professionals' use is worthless garbage, which, if ever mentioned, will cause thier eyes to roll and thier tongues to wag at the possiblilty of crushing another HOME recordists with displays of thier superior knowledge.
After all, compared to them, we amatuers "are deaf and have no idea what musicality is."

Isn't ironic that on the HOME recording.com bbs, we HOME recordists are constantly told that we can never compare our work to "Real" professional recordings. That we DON'T know how to master, we DON'T know what good equipment is, and we DON'T know how to use the resources we have at our disposal.

Which in a way, only makes sense. By trying to create and produce music on our own, we are causing them to lose business. It's gotta hurt, seeing people with little or no training, education or background, have access to tools which took them years to master.


Fire away
 
michaelst said:
Which in a way, only makes sense. By trying to create and produce music on our own, we are causing them to lose business. It's gotta hurt, seeing people with little or no training, education or background, have access to tools which took them years to master.
Click to expand...
What a crock of shit............. :rolleyes:
 
michaelst said:
Which in a way, only makes sense. By trying to create and produce music on our own, we are causing them to lose business. It's gotta hurt, seeing people with little or no training, education or background, have access to tools which took them years to master.

Fire away
Click to expand...

Once again, let me (and the other 200 of you that actually respect our recording peers) reiterate.

*THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTION FOR HARD WORK AND TECHNIQUE.*

There is no miracle plugin or miracle rackmount gear.

The only thing that separates the boys from the men is knowledge, know-how, and experience.
Dont let anything or anyone tell you otherwise. Remember: There is no lazy-man's excuse for know-how or technique.

Your notion that with the availability of the various types of gear, anyone can make a 'decent' recording is completely ass backwards. Its like me saying this 40 years ago: that an electronic keyboard will instantly make you a musician, just like the pros, b/c now you can have something that emulates a really expensive piano/organ/etc...

Ass-backwards, my friend, ass-backwards.
 
I think the meaning of the word "mastering" is different to different people. Personally I prefer the meaning it had before processing plugins and retail copy writing started changing it, when it meant the combination of very high expertise, pristine listening environment and ultra high end processors. So I just prefer "processing", or "final processing" when I think about my own stuff. I can understand why it's aggravating to experienced mastering engineers to have the meaning altered. There's medical, legal and accounting software that many of us use but I don't think there's a similar problem with the names used to represent them.

Tim
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top