D
DemoEtc
New member
Hi:
I've been lurking quite a few months (as you can see I don't post often); great info and a great group looks like. Anyhow, not to waste too much of your time: I've been using an SM58 for general purpose/vocal recording for a few years now. A few months ago I got a DigiTech VR for the wife, and then more recently took a line out from the VR to the POD (version 2) so I could use its compressor. She's really a dynamic singer to say the least.
The sound I got was nice, the same highs and lows but with the compression now in effect.
Most recently we got an AT 3035. I knew I'd have to use the phantom power on my board (Carvin SM162, going into a TASCAM 238) and so I took the signal from the channel insert, routed to line-in on the VR, then out through the POD and then to the track input of the recorder. I got a very unusable, muddy sound with no highs.
My question is, could it be the way I'm sending the signal, or is it just the difference in the way a dynamic mic works as opposed to the condenser? I can't really check the signal route (the way I had it with the 58), because the VR doesn't have phantom power and I don't have the funds to get an external power source.
The 3035 sounds terrific straight into the board and out of the channel insert to the track input, but I'm just wondering if its a mismatch with the POD and 3035, or the way I have the POD being the last device in the chain before the track input.
Thanks in advance for any insight.
Best regards.
I've been lurking quite a few months (as you can see I don't post often); great info and a great group looks like. Anyhow, not to waste too much of your time: I've been using an SM58 for general purpose/vocal recording for a few years now. A few months ago I got a DigiTech VR for the wife, and then more recently took a line out from the VR to the POD (version 2) so I could use its compressor. She's really a dynamic singer to say the least.
The sound I got was nice, the same highs and lows but with the compression now in effect.
Most recently we got an AT 3035. I knew I'd have to use the phantom power on my board (Carvin SM162, going into a TASCAM 238) and so I took the signal from the channel insert, routed to line-in on the VR, then out through the POD and then to the track input of the recorder. I got a very unusable, muddy sound with no highs.
My question is, could it be the way I'm sending the signal, or is it just the difference in the way a dynamic mic works as opposed to the condenser? I can't really check the signal route (the way I had it with the 58), because the VR doesn't have phantom power and I don't have the funds to get an external power source.
The 3035 sounds terrific straight into the board and out of the channel insert to the track input, but I'm just wondering if its a mismatch with the POD and 3035, or the way I have the POD being the last device in the chain before the track input.
Thanks in advance for any insight.
Best regards.