Of course. Anyway, it’s all moot for me because I’d say 4 minutes of my 30 minute shows are dedicated to national news. And what I do put in, it’s 50% already a package that a reporter from Washington has chosen to investigate. The other 50% I choose and right now, most people care about baby formula and gas prices. Maybe as the general elections edge closer can we write about concerns regarding election security, but for the time being, this is what the people want to know. If you can make your own baby formula out of condensed milk and sugar (we’ve interviewed several pediatricians and they’ve all said to NOT do this). Or where they can buy other formula or what government is doing or saying about it.I know what gate keeping is.
But DO you? (write objectively)
Now check this out. Very short clip from ABC official YouTube site.
All kinds of shit wrong with objectivity on this. And I know you’re smart enough to see it.
It's interesting that your studies were limited to the extent of excluding FOX in order to learn anything at all.Well, I studied media bias my senior year thoroughly. If I were to talk about CBS, ABC, and NBC, I would say all three have a left leaning slant. How much? I don’t know, but I don’t think it’s extreme.
Am I objective? Hell no.
The studies did include FOX, though. A Mylo and Groseclose study used ADA scores to compile how biased a news agency was. In my opinion, that method is a little flawed, but it was not a bad attempt.It's interesting that your studies were limited to the extent of excluding FOX in order to learn anything at all.
Anyone who says "as far as I know" about station operations isn't in the loop to know.Using your own logic against you, you don’t work here, so you don’t have any say. You’re just speculating.
You mean the NBC that broadcast doctored audio of George Zimmerman's calls to police and completely skated on any consequences for it?Well, I studied media bias my senior year thoroughly. If I were to talk about CBS, ABC, and NBC, I would say all three have a left leaning slant. How much? I don’t know, but I don’t think it’s extreme.
Pretty sure you’re full of it.You mean the NBC that broadcast doctored audio of George Zimmerman's calls to police and completely skated on any consequences for it?
Pretty sure all the networks broadcast only a limited, out of context portion of the Rodney King video, and all did their bit to promote the "Muh Russia" hoax and the rest of the DemLeftist TDS agenda.
CNN is of course a complete joke.
You’re just full of assumptions. You’re not worthy of anyone’s respect.You mean the NBC that broadcast doctored audio of George Zimmerman's calls to police and completely skated on any consequences for it?
Pretty sure all the networks broadcast only a limited, out of context portion of the Rodney King video, and all did their bit to promote the "Muh Russia" hoax and the rest of the DemLeftist TDS agenda.
CNN is of course a complete joke.
I am curious as to why you believe the moon landings are fake? You say the rockets then didn’t have the capabilities to go to the moon. Do you at least believe they were able to go into orbit?It's interesting that your studies were limited to the extent of excluding FOX in order to learn anything at all.
You could do the world a great informational service by explaining:
1) Why democrats think voting machines, mail in voting, and no voter ID are good for a fair and secure election.
2) Why anyone that questions them is a lunatic.
I think that would help the people in developed countries like England, France, and Germany to understand how our country got so divided over it.
These countries don't allow these things in their elections, and their citizens don't understand why our country does allow these things.
As a citizen of the USA, neither do I understand why.
Thank you very much.
What you really meant to say is "Who's Rodney King?"Pretty sure you’re full of it.
Now check this out. Very short clip from ABC official YouTube site.
All kinds of shit wrong with objectivity on this. And I know you’re smart enough to see it.
I’m sure this was a fun read for you lolWell then it's decided. GREAT read everyone. Excellent work. Give yourselves a round of applause.
This place is a fucking train wreck. And by "this place" I mean the entire western world. But also this shithole.I’m sure this was a fun read for you lol
A shithole is usually full of turds.This place is a fucking train wreck. And by "this place" I mean the entire western world. But also this shithole.
And we of course have your personal assurance it's true, that the partisan buffoonery you display on the regular in here is *in no way* reflected in broadcasts you're involved with.No, it’s because we’re a respectable newsroom that doesn’t peddle clearly partisan buffoonery.
If you would read, I already said I don’t like CNN.And we of course have your personal assurance it's true, that the partisan buffoonery you display on the regular in here is *in no way* reflected in broadcasts you're involved with.
I'm sure Brian "George Costanza" Stelter would tell you what he delivers is truthful and non-partisan as is everything found on CNN. And that he's highly qualified to be a newscaster.