Nuendo 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter realestninja
  • Start date Start date
realestninja said:
how am i a criminal what software nigga you trippin
Please don't call me that.

You're claiming you bought Nuendo legitimately? :rolleyes:
 
yeah for $925.99
why you can get it from someone for cheaper? i can still return just buoght it 4 days ago.
 
you should return it and get something about $800 cheaper

what place lets you return opened software?
 
hey its ok i figured nuendo out just 30 minutes ago, now i need help with my other questions
 
hey its ok i figured nuendo out just 30 minutes ago, now i need help with my other questions
Ok then... post away, and we'll get right on it.... :rolleyes:

I guess you called Steinberg for licensed support, or checked your printed documentation that came w/ your boxed software, or did you just listen to Noisedude?? :D Audigy and Nuendo... that made me laugh... thanks... I just bought some cheap $25 Kelly snow tires to put on my Porsche.... no, that's not even a good analogy!!! :p
 
Input Latency 51.042 ms
Output Latency 100.000 ms
And on the control panel button I have the ASIO buffer latency on 50 ms,
Should I change anything?
No. That's perfect for you.
 
You need to be using a ASIO soundcard I think dude. I have been very pleased with my Firewire 410. Its latency is incredibly low, less that 3ms. I can actually play live with it.

Don't know anything about the Soundblaster stuff, other than its not very good for DAW's.

6
 
Also that stuff in your picture, it ain't going to cut it.

I suggest Firewire connections.

6
 
Oh I fixed it. I've been told the Audigy 2 ZS or higher is all I really need because it uses the 96 KHZ. Anyways

My input Latency is: 3.042 ms
And my output Latency is: 4.000ms

Which means I am in pretty good shape, and for those of you who think Audigy 2 is only for gaming, do some research, because Creative which is the same company that makes Emu 1820m makes this as well.
And it comes with BOTH a hardware module, and a sound card., etc.,
I believe technologies are very similar considering just the hertz of the sound it produces.

They are both 96KHZ and same with Emu1820 96KHZ.
 
Yep! A cheapie plywood Carlo Robelli guitar has the same amount of strings as my Santa Cruz OM/PW, so they must sound very similar!

Oh, your settings are all wrong, they need to be at 11.....
because "it's one louder" :D

I suggest you take a break from recording and work on some basic life skills such as proper English spelling and grammar. That will get you much farther in life than any recording (or lack of) skills...

realestninja said:
I believe technologies are very similar considering just the hertz of the sound it produces.

They are both 96KHZ and same with Emu1820 96KHZ.
 
Whats up with the hatred homie? I'm just doing my thing, you handle your business I handle mine.
 
I believe technologies are very similar considering just the hertz of the sound it produces.
That's the funniest thing I've read in a long time.... It *may* become my new sig..... :D
 
realestninja said:
...and for those of you who think Audigy 2 is only for gaming, do some research, because Creative which is the same company that makes Emu 1820m makes this as well.
And it comes with BOTH a hardware module, and a sound card., etc.,
I believe technologies are very similar considering just the hertz of the sound it produces.
That was the biggest load of bullshit I've seen here in a long time, you really have NO CLUE about what you just said, do you.......... :rolleyes:

Listen skippy, I suggest you read more and post a lot less - you're so clueless you haven't even advanced far enough to know what it is you don't know yet......... :rolleyes:
 
realestninja said:
...Which means I am in pretty good shape, and for those of you who think Audigy 2 is only for gaming, do some research, because Creative which is the same company that makes Emu 1820m makes this as well.
And it comes with BOTH a hardware module, and a sound card., etc.,
I believe technologies are very similar considering just the hertz of the sound it produces.

They are both 96KHZ and same with Emu1820 96KHZ.

Pretty good shape? For a home recordist/hobbyist, maybe, but it seems to me you're striving for something more with your sound. If you ever hope to take your music out in the world "professionally", you'll need an attitude change and to realize that there are no "magical" solutions in recording. You need to build your skills - even with cheap gear at first - and to attempt to understand the basics of recording/mixing/engineering. I've moved to better gear as my skills have improved and as I could afford it.

ALSO - People are trying to assist, but you're moving along at light-speed posting like a mad man, and I don't think you're really grasping what you're being told. You might be best just hanging around here and READING and learning. I joined this place in 1999, and READ alot at first when I first got into this whole recording thing. As I built some skill and knowledge, I was (and am) even able to chime in once in awhile in attempt to help. I still have MUCH to learn and will hang out here and soak in whatever will add to me building further knowledge of all this.

You can absolutely do better than the Audidy 2 card you have for quality (that can be found out by reading in the forums here), but build your skills. The 1820m card and the Audigy are NOT the same - 96Khz is only one factor in the technology. I'm not sure you have an understanding of this.

All this I've posted may not totally fit in this thread, but I've read what you've been posting and I didn't want to respond to the multiple posts and summed it all up here for ya.

P.S. Enough with the racist comments and other slurs/"cuts" as well.

My apologies to the Cubase forum...
 
I'm 19 years old feeding my baby sister and getting her to school and everything, money is scarce for me, do you think if I had money I would buy an emu-1820m? hell no, i'd buy protools HD accel and or Digidesign 002, i just need good sound so i can record my 12 tracks, compile a cd and start pushing my cds at the mall and stuff so i can make money to do bigger projects, u feel me? you guys must have a happy life all dandy and shit cus im having a tough time, and im not the smart kid in town, i aint got no education wahtsoever but i read a lot of psychology books, anyways im looking for help not a lecture, if u dont know what u talkin bout stop posting cus im getting mad confused.

props.
d
 
realestninja said:
I believe technologies are very similar considering just the hertz of the sound it produces.
So, why don't you tell us what the difference between 44.1kHz and 96kHz does for your music.
 
44.1 KHZ means its performing at a lower frequency than 96KHZ, the default on live applications now a days is 96KHZ, some may even go up to 192KHZ, but 96KHZ is DVD quality audio, and it is all you need, we will never go above 96KHZ. If you record something on 44.1KHZ you'll lose quality and it'll be all funky.
 
realestninja said:
If you record something on 44.1KHZ you'll lose quality and it'll be all funky.
Yet more bullshit........... you're talking out your ass, skippy.... learn more, post less....

And what kind of idiot spends $925 on recording s/w if "money is tight"............ :rolleyes:
 
But what does it do to the quality? What do you loose when you record at 44.1 (which is what CDs are) And which format of dvd has 96kHz for the audio?
 
Back
Top