S
sdorange
New member
Considering DA-38+
Hey Folks,
I'm taking the plunge and getting my first recording gear, and like a good net surfer, thought I'd ask some experts to weigh in.
Bottom line, if I want to spend $500 or less, I've thus far concluded the best bang for the buck is a Tascam DA-38 with separate mixer. Here's why:
I've looked at analog 4-trackers, and concluded the Tascam 414 would be a minimum for doing what I want to do, which is: #1 create rhythm tracks with guitar, bass, and drum machine, #2 get a hobby band going. Anything with less than four inputs is probably not going to cut it for the band thing.
But if a 414 goes for $249, why not go to ~$300 and get an 8-track Fostex MR-8? Or a 4-track Boss BR-532? Then I'd be digital, but with only 2 inputs! And then I figure that for equal money, the quality on the low-end digital would get me better sound quality if I went analog. So that would be a 424mkII or mk III, at around $329 new.
But for the same price as a 424, I could shop eBay for used gear, and (if lucky) get a DA-38 for around $325-$350. I'd be without a mixer, but then we're talking only another $150-$200. So for around $500, this would give me excellent sound quality for home studio projects, solid band gear for recording anything from practices to killer demos, and good resale for another 2-3 years. All that, and without dealing with hard drives and software, etc. So why should I spend $250 for an analog 4-track with 2-band eq????
On the surface this may sound like overkill, but anything less means less inputs and inferior sound quality. Otherwise, I may as well get a Porta 01 and just stick to recording practices and weak rhythms.
Does this make sense, or am I missing something?
Much thanks in advance,
-- Scott
Hey Folks,
I'm taking the plunge and getting my first recording gear, and like a good net surfer, thought I'd ask some experts to weigh in.
Bottom line, if I want to spend $500 or less, I've thus far concluded the best bang for the buck is a Tascam DA-38 with separate mixer. Here's why:
I've looked at analog 4-trackers, and concluded the Tascam 414 would be a minimum for doing what I want to do, which is: #1 create rhythm tracks with guitar, bass, and drum machine, #2 get a hobby band going. Anything with less than four inputs is probably not going to cut it for the band thing.
But if a 414 goes for $249, why not go to ~$300 and get an 8-track Fostex MR-8? Or a 4-track Boss BR-532? Then I'd be digital, but with only 2 inputs! And then I figure that for equal money, the quality on the low-end digital would get me better sound quality if I went analog. So that would be a 424mkII or mk III, at around $329 new.
But for the same price as a 424, I could shop eBay for used gear, and (if lucky) get a DA-38 for around $325-$350. I'd be without a mixer, but then we're talking only another $150-$200. So for around $500, this would give me excellent sound quality for home studio projects, solid band gear for recording anything from practices to killer demos, and good resale for another 2-3 years. All that, and without dealing with hard drives and software, etc. So why should I spend $250 for an analog 4-track with 2-band eq????
On the surface this may sound like overkill, but anything less means less inputs and inferior sound quality. Otherwise, I may as well get a Porta 01 and just stick to recording practices and weak rhythms.
Does this make sense, or am I missing something?
Much thanks in advance,
-- Scott
Last edited: