B
bdemenil
New member
Now that NTrack uses .NET - is their any change in performance - does it need more resources?
D
David Katauskas
New member
It always used .Net...now it just uses the newer version.
beezelbubba
Shitty Buddhist
My modest machine (1ghz Duron,512 ddr2100)can't handle V4.1.
3.3 runs fine w/plugins,but 4.1 keeps telling me I'm running outta juice!
3.3 runs fine w/plugins,but 4.1 keeps telling me I'm running outta juice!
D
David Katauskas
New member
Just for clarity, version 4.x of the product uses .Net. I'm not sure what version 3.x used.
B
BilltheCat
New member
4.05 I think was the last version which did not need .net. And for what it's worth, 4.1 actually requires a Microsoft Beta version of 2.0.
IMHO, the drain going from 4.06 (build 1846) to 4.1 is simply not worth it. I have several tracks which stuttered when I had 4.1 on. I have since reverted to 4.06.
The resource issue is really one of hard disk and cpu. Not memory. If you've got your DAW stripped down, then 256mb is plenty. But you'd better have a couple of disks and a pretty decent cpu in any case -- especially if you're going to 4.1
My take.
IMHO, the drain going from 4.06 (build 1846) to 4.1 is simply not worth it. I have several tracks which stuttered when I had 4.1 on. I have since reverted to 4.06.
The resource issue is really one of hard disk and cpu. Not memory. If you've got your DAW stripped down, then 256mb is plenty. But you'd better have a couple of disks and a pretty decent cpu in any case -- especially if you're going to 4.1
My take.
Similar threads
- Viceroyisacat
- Analog Recording & Mixing - Tape & Gear
