R
Richard Monroe
Well-known member
OK, fairs, fair. This is a pretty short list-
Furman PM8 and RP8 power units
Joemeek twinQcs
DBX386
POD Pro
Rolls HA62 headphone amp
Carver PM125 power amp
TC Electronics M300 multi fx
RNC
Soon, I will add Davisound TB-10, I think, for a couple more good channels.
About the units, I will say this-
The twinQ is a workhorse. It functions exceptionally well as a DI, and you get a very different sound if you compress it with the RNC as an insert, and leave the optocompressor off. I would recommend this pre to anyone, in it's pricerange.
The DBX is clean and useable, but quirky. It's indicators suck, and it's front end tube drive is useless for anything I would do. It's a pretty good A-D convertor, and rugged.
The POD does what I need it to do, and yeah, I would like more clean sounds. Mostly, I play acoustic guitar, but I have gotten some use out of the tube preamp model, and every so often, I just have to play Rock and Roll.
The M-300 is a heavy verb, and I wish it could do very subtle reverb better, especially for vocals. It don't matter though, I'm leaving tracks dry and we'll let Littledog add the 'verbs. This box reminds me of some good stage reverb units, it might work really well in that application.
The Carver power amp is clean, but there just is some hum. I like it better for live than studio, to feed signal from POD to Marshall cab. At least theres no fan.
Well, that's it. I think the addition of two channels of higher end pre should round out the rack. Then I will stick the whole thing into an isoraxx!-Richie
Furman PM8 and RP8 power units
Joemeek twinQcs
DBX386
POD Pro
Rolls HA62 headphone amp
Carver PM125 power amp
TC Electronics M300 multi fx
RNC
Soon, I will add Davisound TB-10, I think, for a couple more good channels.
About the units, I will say this-
The twinQ is a workhorse. It functions exceptionally well as a DI, and you get a very different sound if you compress it with the RNC as an insert, and leave the optocompressor off. I would recommend this pre to anyone, in it's pricerange.
The DBX is clean and useable, but quirky. It's indicators suck, and it's front end tube drive is useless for anything I would do. It's a pretty good A-D convertor, and rugged.
The POD does what I need it to do, and yeah, I would like more clean sounds. Mostly, I play acoustic guitar, but I have gotten some use out of the tube preamp model, and every so often, I just have to play Rock and Roll.
The M-300 is a heavy verb, and I wish it could do very subtle reverb better, especially for vocals. It don't matter though, I'm leaving tracks dry and we'll let Littledog add the 'verbs. This box reminds me of some good stage reverb units, it might work really well in that application.
The Carver power amp is clean, but there just is some hum. I like it better for live than studio, to feed signal from POD to Marshall cab. At least theres no fan.
Well, that's it. I think the addition of two channels of higher end pre should round out the rack. Then I will stick the whole thing into an isoraxx!-Richie