
Treeline
New member
Give it time and it'll be fine.Used to be a hell of a lot better...![]()
Give it time and it'll be fine.Used to be a hell of a lot better...![]()
You're going to have serious bass problems, even with the 3" stuff. You could have made 8 703/rigid fiberglass panels cheaper(maybe even 4 4" bass traps and 5 2" normal, which is the minimum i'd suggest for a control room, for a similar price), and they'd have been a lot more effective. I wouldn't suggest getting rid of those, too much just to throw away, but i would suggest building some rigid fiberglass bass traps.I did a room with this stuff
http://www.markertek.com/SearchProduct.asp?item=MF%2D3&off=44&sort=prod&skuonly=0&search=Foam&pagesize=20
Stupid cheap and flame retardant. You can click a link on the page to see the coefficients of absorption. I did several hanging panels that were away from the walls but slightly splayed plus a panel on a chrome blackboard stand. USE THE 3" stuff.
I just used some cheap, lossy plywood and glued the stuff right on there. That and some hanging hardware and I had several excellent abfusers that could be hung or not hung for various acoustical environments. Total cost for 4 54 x 54 height-adjustable panels as right around US $225. Decorate as you will, fabric covers to taste (sheets, tie-dye, whatever floats your boat) but painting them probably isn't a good idea.
I did a room with this stuff
http://www.markertek.com/SearchProduct.asp?item=MF%2D3&off=44&sort=prod&skuonly=0&search=Foam&pagesize=20
Stupid cheap and flame retardant. You can click a link on the page to see the coefficients of absorption. I did several hanging panels that were away from the walls but slightly splayed plus a panel on a chrome blackboard stand. USE THE 3" stuff.
I just used some cheap, lossy plywood and glued the stuff right on there. That and some hanging hardware and I had several excellent abfusers that could be hung or not hung for various acoustical environments. Total cost for 4 54 x 54 height-adjustable panels as right around US $225. Decorate as you will, fabric covers to taste (sheets, tie-dye, whatever floats your boat) but painting them probably isn't a good idea.
Some foam is ok, auralex, but generally, foam isn't great.This is not good advice IMHO. I'd stay the heck away from foam. It will make your problems worse........
Some foam is ok, auralex, but generally, foam isn't great.
Neither do I. Looks quite cheap, imo, and you can build rf panels a lot cheaper which are almost/just as effective.I wouldn't use Auralex myself.......but that's just me.
Most foam*. Auralex is a great foam company, but their products are expensive and, imo, looks quite cheap.Yes, this is what I've read so far as well. Foam just doesn't have the density to be as effective as other materials, especially at low frequencies.
They'd need to be tested for their acoustic properties...For those that have the room, or that are building new construction, straw bales may be a good alternative. About 14" thick and 7 lbs. / cu. foot--denser than rigid fiberglas and the like. Readily available and cheap in many agricultural areas. A green solution, no industrial materials or toxins (that I know of). Wrapping bales in fabric probably wouldn't work, but you could always stand-off a wood frame to stretch the fabric around if that was important to you. I happen to know about these because I'm looking into building a straw-bale house at some point. I haven't checked into the acoustic properties of bales, but I do know they offer excellent thermal insulation and contrary to what might be supposed, they are extremely fire-resistant.
More information: http://www.buildinggreen.com/auth/article.cfm/ID/1080/
For those that have the room, or that are building new construction, straw bales may be a good alternative. About 14" thick and 7 lbs. / cu. foot--denser than rigid fiberglas and the like. Readily available and cheap in many agricultural areas. A green solution, no industrial materials or toxins (that I know of). Wrapping bales in fabric probably wouldn't work, but you could always stand-off a wood frame to stretch the fabric around if that was important to you. I happen to know about these because I'm looking into building a straw-bale house at some point. I haven't checked into the acoustic properties of bales, but I do know they offer excellent thermal insulation and contrary to what might be supposed, they are extremely fire-resistant.
More information: http://www.buildinggreen.com/auth/article.cfm/ID/1080/
35dB. That's about the same as a typical uninsulated stud wall.Yes, we need acoustic testing of the straw bales.
Here's another alternative: I've discovered there are manufacturers of straw panels, typically made from rice or wheat straw, and specifically intended as a commerical and residential building material.
The STC (sound transmission class) of these averages about 35, meaning they cut 35 dB of sound, but no specific information on the frequencies attenuated. Here is one of the manufacturers:
http://www.agriboard.com/
Fine ideas. There really isn't enough space to get into splayed surfaces; something close to what you describe will most likely be what I end up doing.
Really? Doesn't it just reduce bass problems? Can anything completely get rid of bass problems?I did it in a much smaller space. It's the easiest way to get rid of bass problems if you have the opportunity to do it. Any "designed" studio will be made with un-parallel surfaces. Check out my build thread in this section.
You really would only lose about 15 sq. ft total. Much less than your straw bales would take up.
Really? Doesn't it just reduce bass problems? Can anything completely get rid of bass problems?
Again, the BEST thing I have ever done for my studio is to go here - http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/index.php