B
Bergen
Member
So I've been struggling about which mic I should ask for Christmas, and it's impractical for me to demo these, so I'm making this decision based upon reviews, postings here, and dry samples as well as mp3 mixes with these mics.
After initially reading the C1 reviews, I was set on upgrading to it from the MXL 990 I'm currently using. Then I read that the V67G and C1 sound very similar, and that several people think there would be no reason to buy the C1 since the V67G is $100 cheaper. I know you don't get the high pass filter or pad with the V67G(I can get the V67G shockmount for free), but these features don't justify the price difference for me. Then I listen to mp3 mixes with these mics, and I hear distinct differences. The vocal sound of waytf, emeric and other C1 users sound distinctly different from dtb and other V67G users. Here are my impressions.
V67G-like it on acoustic guitar. seems to coat the vocals with a "film" for lack of a better word. Acts like a buffer-will make certain vocal unpleasantries less apparent, but doesn't let the vocal shine. Seems better for less busy mixes where you don't necessarily want the voice to stand out. Some like it for thin, harsh female voices, and I would agree.
C1-allows the voice to float above the mix. voice seems closer and clearer. Gives a high-end sheen that gives it a distinctive professional sound. occassional sibilance issues with some singers, but it seems some sibilance in vocals has become fashionable in pop music today. A good complement for a deep, smooth male voice.
Am I totally off base here? Am I trying to read too much into already processed vocals.
I know I'm posting on an issue that is covered all too much on these boards, but I'm buying one of these in the next few days, and wanted to get some last minute feedback before going the more expensive route.
If anyone's interested, you can hear some vocal samples from a mic shootout I did to help advise me.
http://www.nowhereradio.com/bergen/singles
Thanks
After initially reading the C1 reviews, I was set on upgrading to it from the MXL 990 I'm currently using. Then I read that the V67G and C1 sound very similar, and that several people think there would be no reason to buy the C1 since the V67G is $100 cheaper. I know you don't get the high pass filter or pad with the V67G(I can get the V67G shockmount for free), but these features don't justify the price difference for me. Then I listen to mp3 mixes with these mics, and I hear distinct differences. The vocal sound of waytf, emeric and other C1 users sound distinctly different from dtb and other V67G users. Here are my impressions.
V67G-like it on acoustic guitar. seems to coat the vocals with a "film" for lack of a better word. Acts like a buffer-will make certain vocal unpleasantries less apparent, but doesn't let the vocal shine. Seems better for less busy mixes where you don't necessarily want the voice to stand out. Some like it for thin, harsh female voices, and I would agree.
C1-allows the voice to float above the mix. voice seems closer and clearer. Gives a high-end sheen that gives it a distinctive professional sound. occassional sibilance issues with some singers, but it seems some sibilance in vocals has become fashionable in pop music today. A good complement for a deep, smooth male voice.
Am I totally off base here? Am I trying to read too much into already processed vocals.
I know I'm posting on an issue that is covered all too much on these boards, but I'm buying one of these in the next few days, and wanted to get some last minute feedback before going the more expensive route.
If anyone's interested, you can hear some vocal samples from a mic shootout I did to help advise me.
http://www.nowhereradio.com/bergen/singles
Thanks



studio projects C1?