Hey Bruce - I stopped by Guitar Center to see what monitors they had available and hooked up (at my local GC they're famous for their eye candy... it's NEVER connected). The only ones ready to go were the V8s, so even though I only had a minute or two I took a quick listen. In short, the stereo imaging was IMPECCABLE, at least compared to my Tannoy PBM8s and JBL "client-wowers." The V8s seemed to be both fairly flat and pleasing at the same time, even though that's somewhat of a contradiction. I was very impressed with the short sample.
What we're planning, since a monitor upgrade is next on the list, is to bring our monitors in after arranging for the guys to hook up three or four sets for us so that we can do an accurate comparison with our own reference CDs. Then we'll take the winning two sets back to our own environment.
Can't wait to see the V8s and the Mackies duke it out.
If you don't mind, please give me your thoughts on "age-old debate #6," or "Should they sound good, or should they sound flat?"
Obviously, the perfect monitors are thouse that transfer best to every other system in the universe, but that's awfully hard to judge while A/B'ing 4 sets in a speaker shop. Too many people in these forums just go for the speaker that sounds best and/or pushes the most dBs, but in my opinion, the speaker that sounds best is likely not the best to mix on. The average consumer speaker has significantly scooped mids, a boost around 80 and another somewhere between 5 and 12k. Trying to mix on those is a recipe for disaster.
There are, of course, more details than I would go into in a public forum, but what's your basic philosophy?
Ken Rutkowski
Outer Limit Recording Studio