Sorry, I don't know anything about that one except that it is a condenser mic and therefore I will not use it becasue I don't have isolation to keep out all the extraneous noise.
All mics, whether dynamic or condenser, will pick up sound according to frequency response and polar response. There is no magical feature of dynamic mics that makes them reject noise, except that their lower sensitivity forces you to record close to the source which maximizes signal-to-ambient noise ratio.
Put a condenser *with the same polar pattern* in the same place as the dynamic, and you'll get the same ambient noise.
Seems the basic advice is that you are a lot better off owning as many different types of cheap mics as possible.
I think that's really terrible advice. I'd rather have three decent mics than thirty cheap ones. 'Decent' doesn't have to mean expensive. One reasonable LDC, ideally multipattern, a dynamic, and a pair of SDCs. More dynamics if you need them, but they can all be the same, different mics don't necessarily make anything better.
The main differences are between dynamic, condenser, tube, and ribbon mics.
Tube mics are condenser mics, except for a few dynamic/ribbon weirdos. And technically ribbons are dynamics, but rather different than a moving-coil dynamic.
An expensive one of those sounds only a little different than a cheap one of those, and you can often use eq or other tricks to make up the difference.
And so you can use EQ to make up the difference between thirty flavors of cheap mics, so you don't need all of those flavors.
One thing you can't do with EQ is smooth out a wide variation in frequency response as a function of polar response, so if you are recording a source where off-axis response is important (say anything in stereo), it's really nice to have a mic with a consistent frequency response on- and off-axis.
