
JTC111
Active member
Guys
Why don't we leave Alan alone. It's my thought he only read some of the posts. He might have read that my tech drafted the specs and automatically jumped to today, thought I was taking the credit, and assumed that these are the same. Maybe they are. The Chineese do not always come thru. If you remember the 310 prototype had the tube soldered to the pins. The final was supposed to be a socket mount tube. We got over a hundred of them and they were all soldered. When I confronted the manufacturer, their reply was "cost too much money" Sometimes we are at their mercy. If Alan had it in for me, Why would he contribute the 797 schematics for us to compare? I don't know if those schems are the same for our pres or not. My tech is going over the schematics. Again Alan stated that these were originally for CL. Since he posted this, I have been getting PM's and E-mails to the effect of "had we known these were originally for CL, we would want them. We have heard of CL, but we haven't heard of TnC and our risk is greater with an unknown brand (TnC) than it is with something slated for a company like CL." I have nothing against Alan. He was only informing everyone what he thought (that I was capitalizing on someone elses design). He gave us his endorsment that "it is a good box". Lets drop it. I know we all want to yak while we wait, but lets yak about things that are productive. Look at the spirit of what Alan said and not the letter of his words.
It's a shame Hyatt wasn't as considerate as you when he started blasting you on the boards (and it looks like he got a couple of days head start over at GS before he came here). But you're right, we should leave him alone and I'm willing to do that ....as soon as he apologizes to you for calling you a liar and to every GB participant for causing such a shitstorm.