Grotuitous post-count padding . . .

  • Thread starter Thread starter chessrock
  • Start date Start date
C

chessrock

Banned
Just some random musings on a Friday:

Why is Ed in the Rack forum again telling everyone to forget about their API's and Neves and just go with the ART tube MPs?

Speaking of toobs, I see Fletcher is still basing the Studio Projects preamp at prosoundweb. I wonder what his beef is with that company? My guess is Alan stuck him with the tab when they went to lunch. :D :D :D

On the subject of prosoundweb . . . what ever became of the bitchslap diaries? My gut feeling, in all honesty, is that mixerman is just getting tired. From the sounds of things, he was pulling some late-nighters with that crew . . . and I can't imagine putting all that energy in to something late at night at the end of a long session. Especially when you have a family and all.

My alternate theory is that a book deal was likely offered. Which could mean two more things: a) They (publisher) don't want him publishing the whole book on the damn web before the deal has even been worked out. b) Mixerman wants to be able to really sit down and devote some quality time to his writings when it's all done -- as opposed to half-assed late-night stuff at the end of long sessions.


I guess Steve Albini is the latest in line to sing the praises of the FMR Audio RNP (for those not aware, he's a pretty renowned producer -- Nirvana, Paige & Plant, many others). I don't think I've ever known a producer to be so universally loved yet hated at the same time by so many people. Personally, I think he gets the job done steadily yet unspectacularly. Up to this point, he's been the poster child for the Sytek stuff (as well as the old neotek). Pretty much supports my theory that these days, transparent audio is cheap (see sytek, grace design, fmr audio, etc). While vintage/warm/colored is still fairly expensive, but still within reach if you're willing to make the investment -- see the Groove Tubes Vipre and similar items.

Speaking of Groove Tubes, another trend I like to see are inexpensive Tube mics, and it looks like GT is making some serious contributions in this arena, ironically enough. The latest Recording Mag seems to have a very thorough, exhaustive look at a good portion of their line. Some very favorable comments about their cheaper tube mic, I might add.


And speaking of solid values on great mics, I just got my Blue dragonfly yesterday (Halloween).

Over the course of the past year, I've bought, rented, or auditioned probably 20-30 different mics, and I'd have to say BLUEs are the most unique; in terms of looks, construction and sonics. A bunch of oddballs. But they all seem to sound just stellar in the right application, and the dragonfly is no exception. Best part about them is their company is worth supporting. I predict that I'll be doing just that over the next several years.
 
The only Blue in my range right now is the Baby Bottle. Have you tried that mic? I'm curious how much of the Blue uniqueness translates at that price point.

Completely OT (or not) How many posts do I need before Newbie goes away?
 
freshmattyp said:
The only Blue in my range right now is the Baby Bottle. Have you tried that mic? I'm curious how much of the Blue uniqueness translates at that price point.

Interestingly enough, that one is yet another example of transparency being inexpensive. Of all of BLUE's line, that one is by far the least colored, and with the flattest response curve. And it's also the least expensive.

So in that sense, it's very uncharacteristic of the BLUE heritage. BLUE is mostly noted for interesting colorations and response curves designed to impart a unique and useful sound. What does make it characteristic of their name is the fact that it's still a world-class mic in it's design and performance.
 
Last edited:
chessrock said:
Mixerman wants to be able to really sit down and devote some quality time to his writings when it's all done -- as opposed to half-assed late-night stuff at the end of long sessions.

Well, I have to say I was pretty happy with the way he wrote. If that was half-assed he could easily compete with Douglas Adams in perfectionist half-assedness!

And if you were trying to pad your count you could easily have divided that shit into ten treads! :)
 
chessrock said:


Interestingly enough, that one is yet another example of transparency being inexpensive. Of all of BLUE's line, that one is by far the least colored, and with the flattest response curve. And it's also the least expensive.

So in that sense, it's very uncharacteristic of the BLUE heritage. BLUE is mostly noted for interesting colorations and response curves designed to impart a unique and useful sound. What does make it characteristic of their name is the fact that it's still a world-class mic in it's design and performance.

I have a C1 now and a V67B on the way, I'm thinking that this particular flavor (or lack of) might be a nice addition to the collection. What kind of stuff did you test the baby bottle with?

9 to go...
 
chessrock said:
Just some random musings on a Friday:

Why is Ed in the Rack forum again telling everyone to forget about their API's and Neves and just go with the ART tube MPs?


Did you mean Gratuitous?

It is an oversight like this that made you misunderstand my posts.

:)

Ed
 
darrin_h2000 said:
Lets see, theres his bellari and his m-audio dmp3.

That's moded Bellari with jensen transformer, burr brown opamps, cap values replaced, etc. There's a difference, there. :D Then there's the meek and the midprint . . . but then again, I guess that's not as cool as the Great River Neve clone you're still itching to get, yet don't have the guts to pull the trigger on, eh Darrin? :D :D :D

So I got kickass mics, but modest preamps. Meanwhile, I'm getting lucky with a real woman, and Darrin has his "girlfriend in Canada" (not to mention his blowup doll) he met while camping when he was 14. :D :D

It's okay.
 
The only "Blue" I'll be buying in the near future is made by Labatt's!:D

I think Mixerman ran inot possible problems with his diary. My guess is that he is recording BitchSlap right now and that the diary will either come out online after the session is done, or in book form. He's making it seem like nothing is happening so people won't try finding where the band is.

ART Tube MP's: Hey, they are usable. I agree that the mic is a much bigger factor in the sound than the mic pre. As long as you don't go squashing the "toob", these things can work fine. Maybe Ed knows something. :D

I think the next big thing will be microphones with BBTTE circuits built in! :D

Speaking of experimentation, did you ever post the results of your mic mod? Or how about that Bellari frankenstein mod that was in the works? Whats up with that?

Finally, there is a reason that musicians like me are not plumbers. Just thought you'd like to know that!
 
Oh yes--this one is a purely gratuitous post exclusively crafted to increase post count without saying anything. :D
 
chessrock said:
Why is Ed in the Rack forum again telling everyone to forget about their API's and Neves and just go with the ART tube MPs?

Because he's a god damned, no good, "gratuitous post-count padding" asshole.

:p
 
Last edited:
Re: Re: Grotuitous post-count padding . . .

hixmix said:
Because he's a no good "gratuitous post-count padding" asshole.:p

LOL! ! Man, I'm crackin' up over here. No truer statement has ever been said, God love ya, Ed!" :D

Crawdad, I gotta' be honest with 'ya about this modded Belari: It sounds pretty cool. Even before the mods, NW Soundman sent me an email saying that, in effect, it sounds "cool."

And it does. It's big and ugly. It has that god-awful "Bellari" logo on it, but I'll be damned if it doesn't sound cool. Please be advised that I'm not recommending tracking evertything through this thing. Noooooo waaaaaayyyy. But I am advising that, in the event you have a particular track you want to sound . . . oh, I don't know . . . "cool?" . . . then pull this baby out, plug your favorite mic in and have at it!

My only disappointment? NW Soundman replied to one of my emails saying that the moded channel was almost "too clean" for him. As soon as I tried it out, I couldn't help but concur with him.

The moded channel does indeed sound awfully clean compared to the unmoded channel. But it's clean in a dirty sort of way . . . and I'd almost want to go with the unmoded channel if I really wanted some good, dirty sound.

Otherwise, you've got this moded channel that indeed has a more open sound . . . but with that tube and transformer thickness in there.

Call me a cheap gear slut, but the Bellari . . . unmoded or moded . . . just sounds cool. Make fun of me and flame away as you please ! ! ! Moding this thing in order to sound clean and pristine is almost missing the point -- but I'm not complainig.
 
chessrock:

where did you hear about steve albini praising the fmr rnp?

oz
 
Back
Top